People take charge
ganised by non-profits Paani Foundation, Watershed Organisation Trust, and SparshCentre for Participatory Learning.
“We learnt to read contour maps, and different types of structures to harvest rainwater and how much water those structures can hold. For instance, on heavy slopes, deep cct (continuous contour trench) has to be dug to break the speed of water and also arrest soil erosion. On nullahs, a series of loose boulder structures are beneficial,” says Pankaj Katkar, who attended the training programme.
The five then trained 88 Kiraksal residents and drew up a watershed management plan, with the support of the nonprofits. “We have formed 25 groups of 10-15 residents each and divided the watershed works among ourselves,” says Savita Jadhav, leader of one of these groups. Three more groups have been formed by trained youngsters to check the structures and measure them every evening. “Poor work can wash away the structures in just one rainfall,” says Jadhav.
As per the plan, the residents will construct 300 loose boulder structures, 2,000 cum (cubic metre) of contour bunding, 3,000 cum of compartment bunding, five cement bunds, 10,000 cum of deep cct and eight large farm ponds before the onset of southwest monsoons to harvest rainwater. On April 22, when this reporter visited Kiraksal, the residents had completed 100 loose boulder structures, 500 cum of contour bunding, 1,000 cum of compartment bunding, and 50 cum of cct.
In monetary terms, the shramdan translates into work worth `25-30 lakh, and should save water worth ` 90 lakh in a year (a 10,000 litres water tanker costs the government `2,000), says Amol. “We are confident that next year onwards we won’t have to request the tehsildar for water tankers in the summer months,” says Kiraksal resident Uddhav Katkar.
Kiraksal is not the only village in the state to have adopted rainwater harvesting and watershed development. This year, more than 1,300 villages in 13 districts in Maharashtra have undertaken watershed management works to drought-proof their villages. In February and March, residents from over 5,000 villages across the state participated in the four-day training that Amol attended. “We all want to become paanidar (water sufficient) villages,” says Amol. Residents of the villages say they are drawing inspiration from the 116 villages that last year created decentralised water storage capacity of 13.68 billion litres, which is equal to 1.4 million tankers of water, and can store water worth `272 crore.
Velu village in Koregaon taluka of Satara, about 50 km from Kiraksal, is one of the villages that experimented with the shramdan model last year. Till last summer, the 341 families in the village were facing acute water crisis. All wells in the village would normally run dry by January every year and the village would survive the summers on water tankers. So the residents constructed water harvesting structures between April and May 2016, and this helped them save 2.82 billion litres of water last year. “This is the first summer when we have not called for a water tanker,” says Velu resident Navnath Bhosle.
Failed to act
The people’s movement offers hope to many villages in the state that have been reeling from severe droughts in the past few years. This has crippled the farm sector and rural economy. As per the National Crime Records Bureau, Maharashtra tops the country in farmer suicides. In 2015, more than 3,000 farmers in the state committed suicide, which is 37.8 per cent of the total farmer suicides in India that year.
Even the Jalyukt Shivar Abhiyaan, the state government’s lone scheme that plans to drought-proof all villages by 2019, is moving at a slow pace. For instance, against a total of 186,107 planned works, only 39 per cent were completed by March 25 this year. The scheme, launched in 2014, is plagued with other problems as well. Works undertaken at villages do not follow the ridge-to-valley approach, and are ad-hoc and unscientific, says H M Desarda, economist and former member of the Maharashtra State Planning Board.
The government programme focuses on chasing annual targets and favours the contractors. “There is no or little capacity The drought-prone villages where residents are undertaking watershed works span 13 districts (shaded)
Villages where residents have undertaken watershed management training
Villages where residents are voluntarily building rainwater harvesting structures
Villages where residents voluntarily built rainwater harvesting structures Decentralised water storage capacity built in the 116 villages building. Village residents are not trained in watershed management, hence they fail to question poor works carried out by the contractors,” says Aaba Lad, a farmer in Koregaon taluka, Satara.
Himmat Rao Kharade, deputy collector of Satara, says there are limitations on funding and the number of villages to be covered in one year. “In 2016-17, we selected 25 villages of Koregaon taluka under Jalyukt Shivar Abhiyaan. This financial year, we have chosen 30. At this rate, it would take over five to six years to cover one taluka,” says Kharade. People’s movement can transform rural landscape at a faster pace, he adds.