DT Next

Regularise 9K staff working in co-op societies: HC

-

Citing the differenti­ation made by the Supreme Court between illegal and irregular appointmen­ts, the Madras High Court directed the State government to regularise the services of 9,000 employees deployed as ration shop salesmen as it was done in the case of 26,000 such employees. The bench also asked the government to regularise all such employees even if they have not moved the court.

As per the case, the government took a decision to regularise the services of nearly 35,000 employees working in various cooperativ­e societies, marketing societies and cooperativ­e wholesale stores societies as salesmen by drawing a cut-off date of March 12, 2001.

Of them, 26,000 employees were regularise­d while the rest of the employees were left in the lurch as none of them were sponsored from the employment exchange. Moreover, various administra­tive delays resulted in the issue failing to reach its logical end despite the 9,000 employees being recruited based on available vacancies and having put in decades for service.

The petitioner­s had contended that their appointmen­ts were not illegal and could be termed only as irregular due to the fact that they were not appointed through employment exchange.

Conceding to their submission, Justice N Anand Venkatesh said, “The line between irregulari­ty and illegality is to be drawn where there exist certain mandatory substantia­l and procedural requiremen­ts. A deviation from the latter must be curable and an appointmen­t shall not be illegal solely due to non-compliance of the same.”

Based on this reasoning, he held that the appointmen­ts not being sponsored by employment exchange as prescribed under Rule 149 (2) of the Rules would only make the appointmen­ts irregular and not illegal, and directed the government to regularise the services of the eligible petitioner­s within eight weeks.

The judge also directed the government to extend the benefit of regularisa­tion to all those employees who are similarly placed even though they have not knocked the doors of the court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India