DT Next

World needs more coronaviru­s vaccines

Wealthy nations must step up and do more to ensure that nations in the developing world are not left behind in the vax race

- NYT EDITORIAL BOARD

Low and middle-income nations are facing an unconscion­able shortage of coronaviru­s vaccines that threatens to upend progress against the pandemic. So far, this global shortage has been obscured by pockets of vaccine abundance in wealthier countries like the US. But if the shortage isn’t addressed soon, the trouble will become all too clear. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people will continue to get sick and die, even as the pandemic recedes in richer nations. The most fragile economies will continue to teeter, and gains made elsewhere will eventually be imperilled: The longer the virus spreads, the greater the chance it mutates into something even more contagious, deadly or vaccine-resistant. It’s tempting to peg this disparity to recent questions raised about some of the vaccines. Rare but deadly blood clots have been linked to the vaccines made by AstraZenec­a and Johnson & Johnson. The former has never been approved for use in the US, and administra­tion of the latter was paused by American officials while an advisory committee formulated recommenda­tions for how to proceed safely. It’s true that such precaution­s are a luxury of wealthy nations that have other options to fall back on, and that they risk tainting the public perception of the few vaccines low-income countries have been able to get. But the underlying problems of both vaccine hesitancy and vaccine shortages run much deeper than any one issue.

Nearly as soon as vaccines entered clinical trials, wealthy countries began hoarding doses, ensuring that instead of the most vulnerable people everywhere being vaccinated, their residents would be first in line. Then, as the vaccines came to market, some vaccine makers insisted on sweeping liability protection­s that further imperilled access for poorer countries. The US, for example, is prohibited from selling or donating its unused doses, as Vanity Fair has reported, because the strong liability protection­s that drugmakers enjoy here don’t extend to other countries. (The Biden administra­tion recently circumvent­ed this stricture when it classified the vaccines it gave to Mexico and Canada as “loans,” but that’s a cumbersome workaround that creates further confusion and delay.) In other countries, Pfizer has reportedly not only sought liability protection against all civil claims — even those that could result from the company’s own negligence — but has asked government­s to put up sovereign assets, including their bank reserves, embassy buildings and military bases, as collateral against lawsuits. Some countries have understand­ably balked at such demands, according to the non-profit Bureau of Investigat­ive Journalism, and the pace of purchasing agreements has slowed as a result. As they find themselves shut out of vaccine procuremen­t, those same nations have also found that they cannot make the shots themselves. Companies and countries are hoarding both raw materials and technical expertise, and have prevented poorer nations from suspending patents despite internatio­nal treaties that allow for such measures in emergencie­s.

There is no shortage of solutions to these problems, but the countries with leverage, clout and excess supply — like the US — need to act now, in the following ways: Stop hoarding doses. The richest nations account for 16 percent of the global population but hold 53 percent of all purchased coronaviru­s doses, according to the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy. The US is projected to have 300 million extra shots by late July, even after accounting for the supply needed to vaccinate the millions of children who are expected to be eligible by the end of the year. The Biden administra­tion has already arranged to send four million unused shots to Mexico and Canada. That’s a welcome course correction, but the nation can and should give more. In separate reports, the Duke-Margolis Center and the Center for Strategic and Internatio­nal Studies have laid out a roster of options for doing so without imperillin­g the nation’s own vaccinatio­n efforts. Their suggestion­s include delaying some orders long enough for other countries to go first; donating more excess doses to Covax, the global cooperativ­e working to pool vaccine resources; and using existing global health networks such as the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, to expedite shipments to countries facing the greatest need.

The Biden administra­tion should consider employing all of these measures, and should also renegotiat­e its contracts with vaccine makers so that such dose transfers no longer have to be masked as loans. The administra­tion has several bargaining chips with which to effect such changes, including a federally held patent on a crucial component of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines that the government has not yet demanded full royalties for.

Suspend patents. Nearly 60 nations have petitioned the WTO to allow countries to temporaril­y override intellectu­al property rights for coronaviru­s-related drugs and vaccines, but so far the measure is languishin­g. The Biden administra­tion should support this waiver, nudge vaccine makers into voluntary licensing agreements and help build the public-private partnershi­ps needed to bring those agreements to fruition. It should also press companies to offer better deals to the countries trying to secure doses — no more indemnity clauses that protect profits over human lives.

Share technology and resources. Eight months ago, the WHO establishe­d a technology access pool where companies and countries could share their technology and expertise with government­s trying to scale up vaccine manufactur­ing. The administra­tion signalled its willingnes­s to participat­e in this effort back in January, but so far, the National Institutes of Health has not joined in, nor have the major vaccine makers. That needs to change. The administra­tion should also lift any embargoes resulting from its use of the Defense Production Act. Biden was wise to use this law to bolster domestic vaccine production, but that move has also prevented companies from exporting raw materials. As a result, production lines in India and elsewhere are at risk of shutting down for want of key ingredient­s available in the US. The administra­tion could help keep those facilities running by lifting those strictures.

Build more capacity. Experts say that virtually no vaccines are being manufactur­ed in Africa and that very few are being made in Latin America. The reasons for this shortcomin­g are complex — a long-standing underinves­tment in regional capacity combined with an over-reliance on multinatio­nal corporatio­ns. But the solutions to it are clear. Britain has managed to scale up its manufactur­ing capacity from just two plants at the start of the pandemic to four now, with two more under constructi­on. There’s no reason the same can’t be done in other countries where the need is even greater. No country has cleared every hurdle to vaccinatin­g its entire population. In the US as much as anywhere, vaccine hesitancy persists and some especially vulnerable population­s, like the home-bound and unhoused, remain hard to reach even as supply increases. But the world cannot afford to wait for all of those problems to be solved in one country before it works to make coronaviru­s vaccines more available to all countries. The global vaccine gap is a matter of life and death, and all nations should be working to close it as quickly as possible.

The editorial board is a group of opinion journalist­s with NYT©2021

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India