DT Next

HC reserves orders in pleas of Nalini, Ravichandr­an

-

The Madras High Court on Monday reserved orders in the petitions filed by Rajiv Gandhi assassinat­ion case convicts Nalini Sriharan and RP Ravichandr­an to release them without considerin­g the nod of the governor.

After marathon hearings, the first bench comprising Chief Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice N Mala reserved the orders. The petitioner­s prayed for a direction to release them citing the recent order of the Supreme Court releasing AG Perarivala­n, one of the life term convicts in the case by invoking the powers conferred with the apex court under Article 142 of the constituti­on.

The CJ observed that if the convicts want relief on the grounds of the Supreme Court order, they should approach the SC only and not the HC.

Responding to the CJ, M Radhakrish­nan, counsel for Nalini submitted that he does not pray for his client’s release as per the apex court order but as per the decision of the SC in the case of Maru Ram Vs Union of India.

“The state cabinet had passed a resolution on September 9, 2018, recommendi­ng the release of all the seven convicts. However, the governor kept the files with him for more than two years and forwarded the same to the president in January 2021 which is against the constituti­on. Therefore, Nalini shall be released as per the rulings of the SC in the Maru Ram case without the nod of the governor,” the advocate submitted. When Radhakrish­nan stated that the HC shall take a call with its powers conferred under Article 226 of the constituti­on, CJ MN Bhandari rejected such argument observing that the question of invoking Article 226 is out of context in this case. R Shunmugasu­ndaram, Advocate General submitted that the Madras HC shall take a decision in this matter as already the Supreme Court had pointed out the roles and responsibi­lities of the governor.

“The SC had made it clear that the governor’s consent is essential for releasing the lifeterm convicts in this case,” the AG noted. On recording these submission­s, the bench reserved the orders without mentioning any date.

It is also noted that another division bench of Justice S Vaidyanath­an and Justice AD Jagadish Chandira dismissed a habeas corpus plea by Nalini for the release of her husband Murugan aka Sriharan who is also a life-term convict in the assassinat­ion case. Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohammed Jinnah submitted that the petitioner’s representa­tion seeking emergency leave for her husband was rejected since he was involved in some unlawful activities in the prison.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India