FrontLine

Uttar Pradesh: Infrastruc­ture in a shambles

- BY VENKITESH RAMAKRISHN­AN

The rising COVID-19 figures in Uttar Pradesh point to the debilitati­ng effects of the State’s poor public health infrastruc­ture on the efforts to

deal with the pandemic.

THROUGHOUT JUNE, ALL COVID19 monitoring agencies of the Uttar Pradesh government recorded a steady rise in the number of infections and fatalities. The week comprising the last two days of June and the rst ve days of July registered an alltime high in weekly surge—5,560 new patients and 125 deaths, accounting for 20 per cent of the total caseload in the State and 16 per cent of the total number of fatalities respective­ly. As many as 1,155 cases came up on July 5, the last day of that week. The total number of cases, as of July 5, was 27,707, and 785 deaths. On both counts, Uttar Pradesh is fth among the States affected by COVID19.

These gures, along with hundreds of individual case studies on the medical, social and economic impact of the pandemic, make it starkly clear that the overall situation in the country’s most populous State is worsening by the day. They also underscore the many failures and deciencies of Yogi Adityanath’s government in

handling the crisis and related social and economic issues.

A major cause for concern, right from the rst lockdown in the last week of March, was that the majority of the cases were reported from the western Uttar Pradesh districts—gautam Buddh Nagar, Ghaziabad, Hapur, Bulandshah­r, Meerut and Baghpat. About 100 days and several lockdowns later, these six districts, which form the backbone of the State’s predominan­tly agricultur­al economy, continue to be the most affected. In the rst week of July, they accounted for nearly 8,000 cases. They also have recorded the highest number of fatalities (220) for any administra­tive division of the State, constituti­ng nearly 30 per cent of the total number of deaths.

A couple of days before these gures came out, Chief Minister Adityanath directed the bureaucrac­y in Lucknow and also in the six western districts to evolve special measures to tackle the pandemic. This was followed by an announceme­nt about a special 10day screening campaign.

Professor Sudhir Kumar Panwar, a Samajwadi Party (S.P.) leader and president of the Kisan Jagriti Manch, a collective of activists and academics focussing on agrarian policy and practical interventi­ons in the sector, pointed out that the State government’s Covidrelat­ed initiative­s, especially in the six “agricultur­al backbone” districts, lacked concrete action and output. “The manner in which the medical crisis has continued to spiral in these districts signies how things have been allowed to drift for as long as three and a half months. The economic hardships that have come along with this for the predominan­tly agrarian populace in this region are indeed crippling. There is need for a detailed study on this, leading to wellthough­tout remedial measures and an action plan. It is not clear how actively the State government is pursuing this,” he told Frontline.

The State capital, Lucknow, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Varanasi constituen­cy are also viewed with growing concern. Lucknow added 338 cases between June 29 and July 5, taking the total number of active cases in the city to 550 and recording the third highest number in Uttar Pradesh after Ghaziabad and Noida. Varanasi district recorded 204 new cases and 11 deaths between June 29 and July 5. These gures marked a 46 per cent jump in infections in the district, whose case fatality rate rose to 4 per cent against the State average of 3.6 per cent. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh’s major industrial district, also registered 244 new cases and 13 deaths in the correspond­ing period.

THE PRICE OF POOR INFRASTRUC­TURE

Many State Health department officials who had been consistent­ly highlighti­ng the utter lack of basic public health infrastruc­ture in the State, particular­ly in the rural areas, cited these alarming gures to emphasise how debilitati­ng this weakness was. One senior official, who is also a medical practition­er, said: “As is evident, it is not possible to build up good infrastruc­ture in a short period, especially when you are confrontin­g a pandemic of this scale.” He went on to add that the public health machinery in the State was also corruption­ridden. “We have been getting reports that several private hospitals in different parts of the State have been supplying fake COVID19 negative reports to people for a price. An FIR [rst informatio­n report] has been registered against a private hospital in Meerut for duplicatin­g the seal and stamp of Pyarelal District Hospital, one of the two government hospitals in Meerut, to issue these fake certicates,” he said.

NO SUCCOUR AT HOME

Grinding economic hardships are taking a toll on the people in large parts of the State, especially in rural areas. Historical­ly backward regions such as Bundhelkha­nd and Poorvancha­l are reportedly the worst hit. Right from the middle of May, there have been reports from these regions about migrants who came back as recently as the second week of April preparing to return to the cities where they had worked—delhi, Mumbai and Gurgaon, and cities in southern India. They know that the prospects of regaining their jobs are bleak in those cities, but the situation back home is so grim that they are willing to brave that. Social activist Manoj Singh of Mahoba town in Bundhelkha­nd, who brought this trend to Frontline’s notice in May, said: “Reports coming to us from all over Bundhelkha­nd and Poorvancha­l point to frenzied efforts by these poor people to somehow make a living in their places of origin and the reverses they are suffering in this regard. As reported earlier, they are all contemplat­ing ways to go back and making desperate efforts towards the same.”

He cited the suicide of Dharmendra, a 32yearold migrant labourer in Gangapurva village of Banda district of Bundhelkha­nd, to show how alarming the situation was: “Dharmendra was working as a labourer in Delhi and had returned to his village in April. He tried to enrol himself in the various job schemes announced by the State government, including the rural employment guarantee schemes, but couldn’t nd a place. Villagers say he was getting progressiv­ely depressed and on July 5 he hanged himself.” Dharmendra’s younger brother, Gyan Singh, reportedly told Manoj Singh that Dharmendra was worried about not getting a job, especially because their sister was about to get married.

Manoj Singh felt that the relief schemes announced by the government were not commensura­te with the scale of reverse migration that had been taking place over the past three months. “Hundreds of thousands of people have returned to their villages. It is clear that the government has not got a x on the exact number of those who have returned. Our inquiries show that a large number of those who have returned are starving, what to speak of medical care,” he said.

Manoj Singh is apprehensi­ve that with a pandemic raging and the socioecono­mic conditions worsening, many others may resort to desperate steps. Leaders and activists like Panwar and conscienti­ous officials do not disagree. m

 ??  ?? MIGRANT WORKERS from Uttar Pradesh and their families arriving back in Ahmedabad, on July 1. Many of those who went back home to Uttar Pradesh at the start of the lockdown have started returning to cities in other States in search of work.
MIGRANT WORKERS from Uttar Pradesh and their families arriving back in Ahmedabad, on July 1. Many of those who went back home to Uttar Pradesh at the start of the lockdown have started returning to cities in other States in search of work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India