FrontLine

C.P. Chandrasek­har: A soft blow against China

-

Using economic weapons to temper China’s stand on the border question will not be easy for India. The presence of Chinese firms in a relatively inconseque­ntial area such as mobile apps was an easy and convenient lever for it to use.

IN a surprise move, the Indian government has decided to ban the use of 59 Chinese mobile apps, some of which, such as Tiktok and UC Browser, are extremely popular in India’s consumer digital space. A report in The Wall Street Journal, quoting estimates made by Sensor Tower, said that the banned apps had been the target of 4.9 billion downloads in India since January 2014, including 750 million so far in 2020. The move was widely interprete­d as being part of India’s response to the disturbing developmen­ts along its border with China, and as a means to pressure China, even as India strengthen­s its military positions and negotiates for restoratio­n of the status quo.

India, of course, has not presented this as an act of economic retaliatio­n to evidence of incursion by China into its territory. Rather, it has justied it as a means of preventing the companies owning these apps from underminin­g the sovereignt­y and integrity of the country, and of “stealing and surreptiti­ously transmitti­ng users’ data in an unauthoris­ed manner to servers which have locations outside India.” Given the allegation­s of close links of Chinese companies with the government at home and even the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the action appears to be part of a larger security response to a perceived threat from a neighbour whose inuence in the region has increased signicantly.

In fact, for some time now, and for what appear to be larger strategic considerat­ions, the government has put China’s economic and trading presence in India under watch. Allegation­s of dumping by or aggressive behaviour of Chinese investors and contractor­s have been common. This has, more recently, translated into very specic policy action, with occasional imposition of antidumpin­g duties and of nontariff barriers in the form of quality control orders or other regulation­s. In April, for example, foreign direct investment­s (FDI) originatin­g in neighbouri­ng countries were taken off the automatic approval list, even where permitted. The release from the Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) announced: “An entity of a country, which shares land border with India or where the benecial owner of an investment into India is situated in or is a citizen of any such country, can invest only under the government route.” Specic government permission, and therefore monitoring, was made mandatory. Given the relative importance of investment inows from India’s neighbours, it was clear that this was directed at Chinese investors, private and official, who were seen as picking up equity in

Indian companies at discounted prices as growth slowed and the Covid19ind­uced economic crisis struck.

ECONOMIC OFFENSIVE

But now comes evidence that such defensive economic action will be widened to include offensive measures. Besides banning popular Chinese apps that have overwhelme­d India’s digital space, despite India’s claim of being a software power, reports have it that the government is planning to dissuade private telecom operators and the stateowned telecommun­ication companies MTNL and BSNL from purchasing hardware from Chinese rms (especially Huawei and ZTE) to upgrade their networks. Chinese players are also to be kept out of Indian highway projects, including participat­ion through the joint venture route.

While these and similar measures are being discussed in the corridors of government, “Track 2” efforts seem under way outside government, with a campaign for boycott of Chinese goods and for policies that impose restrictio­ns on imports from China. As of now, the emphasis is on appealing to popular patriotism, with the government facilitati­ng a boycott by requiring ecommerce rms to publish the country of origin on all the goods sold through their web marketplac­e.

These economic responses in the face of growing diplomatic and military tensions between the two countries have raised a number of questions. One is whether these moves are merely symbolic or would actually hurt China enough to encourage it to hold back, engage in negotiatio­ns on border issues and arrive at a settlement acceptable to India. Another is whether India, too, would lose as a result of these measures, and whether the cost of deploying such instrument­s would hurt an economy that has clearly lost momentum. The answers to these questions would determine whether, together with the announceme­nt of the Atmanirbha­r (selfrelian­t) Bharat drive, these responses targeted at China would put India on a trajectory that reverses the trade liberalisa­tion and open economy agenda adopted by successive government­s since 1991. That trajectory

would possibly be supported by sections of business that are looking for protected spaces in the domestic market. Though the ban on apps will not immediatel­y signicantly hurt the prots of Chinese rms, it will check their advance to dominance in the Indian market that is being seen by all as being the next frontier digital market (after China), given the size and demographi­c prole of its population, and the low levels to which data costs have been pushed by cutthroat competitio­n. The result has been proliferat­ion of ownership of smartphone­s, increase in Internet use and the growing popularity of ecommerce. According to ByteDance, the company that owns TikTok, that app was being used by at least 120 million Indians every month. While those numbers were yet to translate into revenues and prots, the potential is immense, especially given the collateral advantage that these socalled “tech rms” have in collecting and collating data.

Moreover, Chinese giants such as Alibaba and Tencent have been investing heavily in Indian startups, betting on their success and the returns from appreciati­on of equity values that was expected to bring. So, if kept out of India’s digital market, Chinese rms are likely to be signicant losers.

That said, the loss of an Indian presence would not be the end of the world for all Chinese rms, which have grown to global scales based on business at home, have strong control over the large home market, and have other jurisdicti­ons to diversify into. It affects more the likes of Huawei, which was banking on becoming the world leader in 5G technology, and which is being kept out on security grounds from many developed country markets. The absence of Chinese rms in India’s Internet space would also not hurt China’s economy much, though its mercantili­st ambition, already being thwarted in the United States and elsewhere, would suffer a minor dent. Even if the fortunes of tech rms are seen as inuencing China’s strategic stance, it is unlikely that loss of the Indian market would force the Chinese government to bend on what it declares to be issues of national sovereignt­y and integrity.

For India, extending its economic response to the military standoff to include trade in goods is the challenge. There is a reason for the government choosing the Internet arena to launch its China offensive. Given the structure of merchandis­e trade between India and China, it is far more difficult for India to counter China there. The sharp spike in Indiachina trade over the last decade or so has seen India’s imports from China rising much faster than its exports to that country. The net result is that in 201920, when slowing growth brought down imports from China, India ran a decit of $48.7 billion in its trade with China, which, adding exports and imports, totaled $81.9 billion. When growth in India was better and trade buoyant, its China trade decit stood at $63 billion in 201718 and $53.6 billion in 201819.

This decit, it could be argued, strengthen­s the case for trade sanctions against China, as that would bring down imports and reduce the shortfall relative to exports. But India’s imports reect not just China’s competitiv­eness in the Indian market visavis domestic and third country suppliers. It is also indicative of India’s dependence on China, not just for cheap nal products but crucial and reasonably priced intermedia­tes and capital goods. China accounts for close to 15 per cent of India’s exports, and is an important supplier in areas such as mobile phones, telecom, power, and pharmaceut­ical intermedia­tes. Two categories of imports, “Nuclear Reactors, Boilers, Machinery & Mechanical Appliances” and “Electrical Machinery, Telecom Equipment, Audio & Video Recorders, account for 50 per cent of imports from China, and “Organic Chemicals” for another 12 per cent. Close to 50 per cent of India’s electronic­s imports originate in China, with that dependence rising to around 66 per cent in the case of pharmaceut­ical ingredient­s. India’s dependence on Chinese supplies is not just large but also heavily concentrat­ed.

SOARING DRUG PRICES

These imports are not all easily substitute­d from other sources. The consequenc­es of such dependence were experience­d recently. Thus, when the COVID19 pandemic shut down production facilities in China, drug prices rose in India and producers expressed concerns about shortages of crucial intermedia­tes. Together with delays in customs clearance of imports from China in recent times, critical drugs, such as the blood thinner Heparin, are in short supply and have turned more expensive, so much so that the National Pharmaceut­ical Pricing Authority (NPPA) has allowed a onetime price increase of 50 per cent in the ceiling price of Heparin injection used in treatment of those infected with COVID19.

All this suggests that a sudden reduction in imports from China can be disruptive, and is likely to inuence government thinking, leaving aside the possibilit­y that China would appeal against what it considers discrimina­tory protection against its goods at the WTO. So while the military and diplomatic standoff would be difficult to resolve, using economic weapons to temper China’s stand would not be easy either. The presence of Chinese rms in a relatively inconseque­ntial area such as mobile apps was, for the India government, an easy and convenient lever to use. Finding more such levers could prove difficult. m

According to Bytedance, the Tiktok app was used by at least 120 million Indians every month.

 ??  ??
 ?? PRAKASH SINGH /AFP ?? A DEMONSTRAT­ION urging Indians to boycott Chinese mobile apps and products, in New Delhi on June 30.
PRAKASH SINGH /AFP A DEMONSTRAT­ION urging Indians to boycott Chinese mobile apps and products, in New Delhi on June 30.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India