Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Majithia is to blame for ₹915-cr loss to coop sugar mills: Cong

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH : Punjab Congress leader Sukhjinder Raj Singh ‘Lalli’ Majithia on Saturday accused former Akali minister Bikram Singh Majithia of complicity in ₹915 crore “scam” in allocation of power tenders related to eight of the nine sugar mills in Punjab.

Addressing a press conference, Lalli alleged gross irregulari­ties and nepotism in allocation of tenders for upgrading, modernisat­ion and installati­on of cogenerati­on plants in the eight mills, resulting in huge losses to the state exchequer.

“The total estimated loss from 2010-11, the year in which these projects should have been operationa­l, till now is ₹915 crore,” said Lalli. “The losses will continue to pile up till the time co-generation plants are made operationa­l.”

The mills not only failed to earn ₹668-crore revenue, but also suffered losses of ₹245 crore over a period of seven years on account of salaries, repair and maintenanc­e, fuel and purchase of hydel power, said Lalli, on the basis of Sugarfed documents.

Alleging the “scam” rendered cooperativ­e sugar mills across the state incapable of being selfsustai­ning, Lalli demanded probe by a special investigat­ion team (SIT) into it.

‘MISUSED CLOUT TO OBTAIN CONTRACTS’

Sugarfed, apex body of cooperativ­e sugar mills in the state, had floated the tenders for the work on behalf of the eight mills in 2008.

Lalli alleged Saraya Industries Limited (SIL), a family unit of Bikram Singh Majithia, “misused” his official clout and obtained the contracts for four mills directly and four in the name of another company, A2Z.

“SIL bagged orders for Nawanshahr, Ajnala, Batala and Gurdasprur and A2Z for Morinda, Budhewal, Nakodar and Fazilka,” said Lalli. “Tenders received from SIL were conditiona­l and not as per terms of notice inviting tenders (NIT) and hence should have been rejected there and then. The earnest money deposited by these eight mills amounting to ₹3 crore should also have been forfeited.”

The Congress leader said both SIL and A2Z failed to deposit security amount of ₹2 crore. Later, to get the earnest money refunded, which SIL had deposited for three mills, it filed arbitratio­n cases with the registrar, cooperativ­e societies, for the cancellati­on of the memorandum of undertakin­g (MoU).

Lalli alleged Tajinder Singh Virdi, the then additional registrar, under “coercion” from Bikram ordered the release of 80% of earnest money in violation of the MoU terms and also ordered cancellati­on of the MoU. Claims of the mills for losses incurred were completely ignored, said Lalli.

Majithia did not respond to repeated calls by HT.

CONG’S SUKHJINDER RAJ SINGH ‘LALLI’ DEMANDS PROBE INTO ALLOCATION OF TENDERS IN 2008

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India