SC rejects raped 10-yr-old UT girl’s abortion plea

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court noted on Friday a sharp rise in pleas from women seeking abortions beyond the legally permissible time limit while rejecting a 10-year-old rape survivor’s request to terminate her 32- week pregnancy.

Medical opinion placed before the court said the abortion would not be in the interest of either the girl or the foetus.

A bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar asked the central government to consider setting up a permanent medical board in every state to quickly decide on pleas from pregnant women asking for terminations beyond the permissible 20-week period. The bench said these boards were needed to save time because such cases were coming to the courts in a “big way”.

This year, the Supreme Court has received at least seven petitions from women, including teenage rape survivors, asking to terminate pregnancies beyond 20 weeks.

The top court disallowed abortion sin two, including Friday’ s, lawyers said.

Terminations are allowed beyond that in rarest of circumstances if doctors say it is necessary to save the mother’s life.

Friday’s order came after the court perused the report of an expert panel set up by the PGI, Chandigarh, to find out“whether the health of the girl concerned and the child would be adversely affected if the pregnancy is allowed to be full term”.

The bench expressed satisfaction over the medical care being provided to the rape survivor and dismissed the PIL filed by a lawyer seeking the abortion.

To the court’s suggestion on setting up permanent medical boards in states, solicitor general Ranjit Kumar said he would inform the court whether such boards can operate while amendments to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act ( MT PA ), 1971, considered extending the time-limit from 20 to 24 weeks.

The girl, who hails from Chandigarh, was repeatedly raped by her uncle.

Her parents were poor and had approached the Chandigarh district court for permission to terminate the pregnancy.