Sushil’s golden comeback sullied by three walkovers
LOST SHEEN Double Olympic medallist’s gold in Nationals points at shallow state of Indian wrestling
NEW DELHI: Sushil Kumar’s gold medal-winning comeback to competitive wrestling at the national championships in Indore on Friday, hailed by the grappling fraternity, has highlighted a few things very wrong with the sport in India at the moment.
A visibly rusty Sushi l--re turning to competition after a gap of almost three years -- recorded two victories against tame opponents in the preliminary rounds before receiving three straight walkovers from the quarterfinal stage en route to gold. In all likelihood, even the 34- year-old double Olympic medallist would not be proud of the way he won.
After all, Sushil is aiming for bigger things (read Asian and world medals) during his comeback and strong bout sand tough opponents can only help him get back to his best, or even give him a reality check.
The latter -- upcoming young wrestlers giving Sushil a reality check--would have been the ideal case scenario for Indian wrestling.
However, the quality of wrestlers in Sushil’s 74 kg category at the nationals has proven that the sport in the country has not moved forward, but taken countless steps backwards from the much-celebrated golden era. That periods aw S us hilwi na sensational world title (2010 in Russia) and two Olympic medals (Beijing 2008 and London 2012), while Yogeshwar Dutt (London 2012) andSa ks hi Malik( Rio 2016) too made their mark.
Then came the Narshingh Yadav farce last year in Rio (the selection trials drama with Sushil and subsequent doping scandal ). During the fiasco, ParveenR ana, a junior world championship bronze medal list, was touted as the next big thing in the 74kg freestyle category.
Rana, representing Railways Sports Promotion Board( RS PB) at the nationals, chosen otto fight Sushil, his senior, in the final in Ind ore. Maybe it was team orders -- Sushil wrestled for RSPB too and Rana had given walkover to him even at the Railways trials last week. Maybe it was out of respect, fear, or both, but the walkovers have taken away the charm in Sushil’s comeback.
For the record, Rana, Sachin Rathi of UP (in semis), Praveen of Haryana B (in quarterfinals) gave walkovers to Sushil. Three wrestlers from the strongest wrestling states chose not to fight one of India’s best wrestlers, giving up a golden chance to gain experience from it, not to mention the outside chance of beating the champion.
SLUGGISHSUSHIL
Sushil breezed past Lalmal Sawma of Mizoram in the first round. But, going by the way he fought against Mukul Mishra of Jharkhand, a wrestler of Rana’s calibre could have fancied his chances of winning. Sushil was sluggish, struggling to get his famous stand-up combination take downs going. In fact, a couple of times during the bout, he even seemed lost after getting into a strong position with neck locks.
He also struggled to make quick transitions on the ground to apply the scissors-lock (Irani). He did manage to win the bout applying it, but things were clearly not smooth or snappy -the comparison here being with his peak, between 2009 and 2012.
While Sushil, the great champion that he is, may hit the peak in the coming months to challenge for medals at international competitions, one, sadly, can’t say that about Indian wrestling.
All the strong wrestling nations -- be it the USA, Iran or Russia -- ensure quality through an assembly-line of talented wrestlers who compete and challenge each other. A Russian or American reigning world ch am-
pion may not find a spot in the team the next time merely because of his past medals. Such a precedent or system is not in place in India. Coupled with that, the wrestlers’ reluctance to fight strong opponents -- some put the blame on the sacred, senior-junior hierarchy prevalent here -has put Indian wrestling back to where it was before the 2000s.
A rot is on and wrestlers and the governing body are equally party to that, while we are left with an ageing champion as our biggest hope for the future.