Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

HC bans term Dalit in official communicat­ion

- Press Trust of India htreporter­s@hindustant­imes.com

BHOPAL/GWALIOR: The Gwalior bench of Madhya Pradesh high court has banned the use of term Dalit in official communicat­ion. In its order delivered on Monday, the court said, “The state and Central government should refrain from using the nomenclatu­re Dalit as it doesn’t find any mention in the Constituti­on or statute.” Social activist Mohan Lal Mohor had filed a PIL in the high court about a month ago. ››

NEWD ELHI: The Delhi High Court will hear on Wednesday fresh petitions filed by 20 AAP MLAs, challengin­g the Cent re’ s notificati­on against their disqualifi­cation for holding an office of profit.

The fresh petitions, which were filed aday after their earlier pleas became infructuou­s on account of the President giving his assent to the Election Commission’s recommenda­tion to disqualify them, said the decision by the President as well as the Election Commission (EC) were taken in “undue haste”.

The MLAs, whose appointmen­t to the post of parliament­ary secretarie­s was held as office of profit, contended that the entire episode leading to their disqualifi­cation was a clear manifestat­ion of the process in which they were denied the principle of natural justice of being heard.

Their petitions were mentioned on Tuesday before a bench of Justice sS Ra vin dr aB hat and A K Chawla, which listed them for hearing on Wednesday.

Advocate Manish Vashisht, appearing for five legislator­s, submitted that “the findings of the EC are contrary to Article 14 (equality before the law) of the Constituti­on of India, ultra vires, void a bin it io and an attack on the basic fabric of democracy.”

The move came after the A AP MLAs on Tuesday withdrew their pleas challengin­g the Elec- ti on Commission’ s recommenda­tion which had received Presidenti­al as sent.

On January 19, the poll panel had made the recommenda­tion for the disqualifi­cation of the 20 legislator­s, which was given assent by the President.

On January 20, the Ministry of Law and Justice issued a notificati­on that the President held that the 20 MLAs stand disqualifi­ed under Section 15(1)(a)of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) Act.

The EC had made the recommenda­tion while deciding a plea by advocate Pr ash ant Pa tel, who had sought disqualifi­cation of 21 AA PM L As for holding the office of parliament­ary secretarie­s, which he had said amounted to office of profit.

The proceeding­s against Jarnail Singh were dropped after he resigned as the Rajouri Garden MLA to contest the Punjab Assembly polls.

The plea by the MLAs sought quashing and setting aside of the January 19 opinion of the election commission and the Centre’s January 20 notificati­on stating the President had held that the 20 MLAs stand disqualifi­ed under the GNCTD Act.

The notificati­on came after the EC wrote to the President recommendi­ng disqualifi­cation of 20 AAP MLAs for holding office of profit while serving as parliament­ary secretarie­s between March 13, 2015 and September 8, 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India