KARNATAKA’S RESOLVE
Cultivators stake claim over river water, stating that if monsoon is bad like in past years, it will be difficult to give water to TN no matter what anyone says
MANDYA: Sakkare Nadu or City of Sugar, Mandya, mourned the death of farmer leader K on as ala Nara saraju ,58, on January 30.
Narasaraju, who had been at the forefront of K ar nat aka Raj ya Ry thu Sang ha’ s agitation for C au very water, had died five days ago. A firebrand farmer leader, he had always insisted the state’s farmers had the first right on Cauvery water.
Mandy a is no stranger to farmer suicide san done-and-a-half years ago, Naras a raj uh ad warned of more such deaths if water was sent to Tamil Na du instead of Karnataka’s needy farmers in the Cauvery basin comprising Mandy a, My sore, Chamarajanagar.
People mourning him promised to be as determined.
“Water for me first and then for anyone else,” said his son, Chetan Kumar, a farmer and school teacher .“There could be fresh trouble as the Supreme Court verdict may go Tamil Nadu’s way because their lawyers are better. This year monsoon has been good, but if it is bad like in the past few years, it will be difficult to give water to Tamil Na du no matter what anyone says .”
Passions ran high among the mourn- ers, who congregated at Pravasi Mandir in Mandy at own, as they formed a human chain for peace and communal harmony.
A mention of Cauvery water-sharing dispute and the impending Supreme Court verdicts parked off an intense discussion. Most participants insisted Tamil Nadu was at fault.
Two years ago, when the Supreme Court ordered Karna ta kat ore lease Ca uvery water to Tamil Na du, violent protests erupted in Ben ga lu ru and Mandy a, where pro-Kannada activists torched business establishments owned by Tamil ian sand attacked vehicles bearing Tamil Nadu registration. The IT sector too witnessed disruptions, hurting the brand Bengaluru image.
Ahead of the SC verdict, people in Mandya are hopeful it will protect Karnataka’s interests.
Ramakrishnayya, state secretary of K ar nat aka Rash tr a Ry thu Sang ha, said, “Giving Tamil Nadu the water it demands is just not possible.”
According to him, it“is not just nature, even the Centre and the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal are against us ”. Fellow farmers nodded in agreement .“If the rain is good, we can give water to Tamil Na du. If the rain is poor, how can we give it to them? We will not allow water to be given to Tamil Na du until all our farmers get all the water they need,” said Ramakrishnayya.
Local leaders are equally rigid. KS Putt anna iah,M LA of Melukotei nM andya and a farmer himself, argued for reducing the quantum of water allocated to Tamil Na du from the present 192 thousand million cubic feet (tmc ft) to 165 tmc ft. “Let us wait for the judgment. We will take a call only after seeing the order,” he said.
Educationist TV Mohandas Pai said he hoped the Supreme Court would“correct the in justice meted out to Karnat aka” way back in 1924, when Tamil Na du (then Madras Presidency) got the judgment it wanted through the good offices of the British.
Mandy a farmers believe the top court will consider the reality that Karnataka is the biggest dry land state in the country after Rajasthan and do justice.
Not all voices are rigid, though. Kodihalli Chandrashekhar, a farmer leader from southern Karnataka, believes a solution will have to be reached through a dialogue between farmers of both states. This is inline with what S Ran ganathan, general secretary of Tamil Na du C au very Delta Farmers’ Welfare Association, also believes. However, like Rang a nathan, Chandra shekh ar too blamed politicians “for the current mess”.
Former IAS officer of Karnataka cadre, Renuka Viswanathan, now an aspiring MLA from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), said, “Politicians always feed on conflicts, whip up emotions and try and find a convenient enemy to target.”
She said the issue should be left to the farming communities of the two states to resolve it themselves.
“But one thing for sure is both states need to use water efficiently and plan their crops well ,” said the former bureaucrat, who worked with the Planning Commission, now scrapped and replaced by Niti Aayog.
LOCALS WARN OF FRESH TROUBLES, LIKE THE VIOLENT PROTESTS THAT BROKE OUT ACROSS THE STATE TWO YEARS AGO, IF TOP COURT TELLS KARNATAKA TO RELEASE WATER TO TN