Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Team India’s spin perfect, pace tense

REPORT CARD While Karthik needs to get more chances, India also need to find backup options for Bumrah, Bhuvi

- AAKASH CHOPRA Writer is a former India opener

India rested half-a-dozen players and still turned out to be too strong for their neighbours. India got a jolt in the first match but regrouped nicely to not only clinch every game thereafter but also become the only team in the tournament to win a game defending a total of 176 against Bangladesh in the league phase.

It wasn’t just a trophy win but a statement of strength by India. While most games were exciting to watch, there’s been a constant issue affecting T20 cricket --teams chasing have a distinct advantage, and, therefore, most T20 games follow the same template across the globe. Winning the toss is akin to winning half the match. That must change.

Coming back to India’s gains, it’ll be difficult to look past Karthik’s heroics in the final and his growth as a player since his comeback. While potential and promise were always there, Karthik’s performanc­e left a lot to be desired. He made his internatio­nal debut before Dhoni and got multiple chances to cement his place, but couldn’t. Earlier, he would make a good 20-30 before getting dismissed and leaving the team in the lurch. But since his latest comeback, he’s taken it upon himself to be there till the end and finish the games off. Maturity has replaced vanity and his innings constructi­on suggests he’s finally cracked the code.

Laxman told me that succeeding in internatio­nal cricket is about the knowledge of constructi­ng an innings and it can take years for players to understand what works for them. Karthik’s knowledge of his strength and calmness under pressure came to the fore in the final and he’s made a case for his inclusion in the ODI setup too. After all, middle muddle is yet to be sorted.

THE POSITIVE

For someone who started as a batsman, Sundar has transforme­d well as a limited-overs bowler. He bowled the tough overs in all the games and held his own. He’s tall and has a clean high-arm action, which allows him to finish within the stumps most of the time. Sundar bowls a flat trajectory and relies on his accuracy with regards to length. His trajectory doesn’t allow batsmen to use their feet and the length is neither short enough to pull nor full enough to get under while parked in the crease.

India’s spin department is already fairly crowded (so much so that Ashwin, Jadeja are nowhere close to getting back) and Sundar’s return has added another option. Ideally, India should have tested him a little with the bat too but that will have to wait.

While the spin cupboard is overflowin­g, the same can’t be said about fast bowling. For the first time in over a year both Bumrah and Bhuvneshwa­r were rested, and that presented an enviable opportunit­y for Unadkat, Thakur and Siraj to make a mark. Thakur did have one good game but it’s clear that he’s work in progress. Unadkat was supposed to be the leader of this pack but didn’t look like one. Siraj hasn’t been able to convert potential into performanc­e thus far. If India want to dominate whiteball cricket, they’ll have to find backup options for Bumrah and Bhuvneshwa­r. This tri-series was expected to bring India closer to finding them but, unfortunat­ely, it’s still as far as it was at the start of the tour.

 ?? AFP ?? Chahal picked three crucial wickets in the final.
AFP Chahal picked three crucial wickets in the final.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India