Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Aseemanand says he was ‘politicall­y implicated’

Samjhauta accused says he has full faith in country’s judicial system

- HT Correspond­ent vivek.gupta@hindustant­imes.com

PANCHKULA:Swami Aseemanand who was acquitted earlier this week by a special NIA court in Hyderabad in the Mecca Masjid blast case said on Saturday said he had been politicall­y implicated in that case as well as the Ajmer Dargah bombing and Samjhauta blast case.

“I was politicall­y implicated in the blast cases,” he told reporters after showing up for hearing in another special NIA court in Panchkula in the trial of the Samjhauta blast case where he is also a prime accused.

The Samjhauta blast case is the only pending case against him after his acquittal in Mecca Masjid case this week and the Ajmer Dargah bombing case in March last year.

he was reacting for the first time after his acquittal in the Mecca Masjid blast case.

PANCHKULA: Swami Aseemanand who was acquitted earlier this week by a special NIA court in Hyderabad in the Mecca Masjid blast case said on Saturday said he had been politicall­y implicated in that case as well as the Ajmer Dargah bombing and Samjhauta blast case.

“I was politicall­y implicated in the blast cases,” he told reporters after showing up for hearing in another special NIA court in Panchkula in the trial of the Samjhauta blast case where he is also a prime accused.

The Samjhauta blast case is the only pending case against him after his acquittal in Mecca Masjid case this week and the Ajmer Dargah bombing case in March last year.

Reacting for the first time after his acquittal in the Mecca Masjid blast case, he said that truth has prevailed in the Hyderabad and Ajmer cases. “I have full faith in judicial system in the ongoing trial (Samjhauta blast) too,” he said.

While he kept mum on statement of BJP’s Bengal State president on roping him for strengthen party there, his counsel Manbir Rathi said that he was victim of political terrorism and verdict of two cases - Hyderabad and Ajmer case - proved that truth has won.

“Terrorism has no religion. While it should be condemned by every citizen, it was wrong to implicate people for political purposes,” Rathi said.

He said that in Samjhauta blast trial, 213 witnesses have been examined so far and about 30 witnesses are left to be examined.

On Saturday, two witnesses, both judicial officers were examined in the hearing. The court fixed the next date of hearing for May 4.

Sixty eight people, including 42 Pakistani passengers, were killed in the firebombin­g of Samjhauta Express that took place when the bi-weekly train, connecting Delhi and Attari at India-Pakistan border in Punjab, was crossing Panipat on the night of February 18, 2007.

The initial investigat­ion was carried out by the Railway Police and the Haryana Police, but in 2010, the Centre handed over the probe to the NIA, which filed the charge sheet against alleged Hindu extremists Naba Kumar Sarkar alias Swami Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi (now dead), Lokesh Sharma, Sandeep Dange and Ramchandra Kalasangra alias Ramji.

Meanwhile, the court has not heard anything on the arrival of 13 witnesses from Pakistan. They were summoned in July and then in November last year to depose in this case but they did not turn up. The court has summoned them on August 3 now.

 ??  ?? ■ Aseemanand (right) coming out of a Panchkula court after hearing in the Samjhauta Express blast case on Saturday. SANT ARORA/HT
■ Aseemanand (right) coming out of a Panchkula court after hearing in the Samjhauta Express blast case on Saturday. SANT ARORA/HT

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India