Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

MAMA, DON’T TAKE MY KODACHROME AWAY

A book on brands that went topsyturvy but fought on is a compelling read

- Sujoy Gupta letters@htlive.com Sujoy Gupta is business historian and corporate biographer

No, the hyphen in the single-word cover title isn’t a typo. It’s there to assert that this book is as unique as the brands it talks about. Curiously, Ramya isn’t a brand executive. She’s described as a storyboard creator busily tracking the advertisin­g and marketing ups and downs of soft media products created for TV channels like Star World and National Geographic.

Brands comprise a congested part of business literature. But Ramya has spotted a vacant niche and authored a compelling storybook, not a ponderous textbook, on brands that went topsy-turvy but fought on. Only Indian brands (some are US-owned) are covered, but with as many as 21 well-researched tales told of “how these brands overcame crises and emerged stronger, better, wiser” that shortcomin­g doesn’t count.

Ramya might not agree but I see brands as human beings. They are conceived, born, nurtured, cared for when knees get bruised, marched through grow-up-strong drills, recognised as adults and let into a big bad competitiv­e world by loving, tense parents. Some survive hard knocks, some don’t. Ramya favours those who do.

“Crisis” is the defining word in the author’s absorbing narrative and the very first paragraph says so. “It may seem incendiary to start off a book about the business of branding and marketing by suggesting that every brand is a crisis in waiting... The very existence of a brand doesn’t necessaril­y mean that a crisis will occur but the possibilit­ies of one happening are far too real to ignore.”

Is it okay if Crises spelt with capital C aren’t provided for? Ramya’s analyses show it isn’t. When brands are mauled owners face financial, market share, goodwill and loss-of-face costs adding up to a tidy sum. It is expensive to rebuild an injured brand. Major factors and several subsidiary ones mesh to create this book’s contents.

Let’s pick three of 21 famous brands. Since 1947, Cadbury’s chocolate has enjoyed “a remarkably positive brand image”. On 3 October, 2003, a consumer in Mumbai complained to the government that two bars of Dairy Milk chocolate bought from a local shop were worm-infested. The media went ballistic. The minister visited the factory and gave Cadbury a clean chit. The very next day, the minister said hygienic production wasn’t enough, retail-storage hygiene too was Cadbury’s responsibi­lity. Within a week, the sales volume of Cadbury products plummeted from 70 to 30 per cent! Emergency brand repair commenced in crisis mode. Ramya describes Cadbury’s subsequent survival story.

Everyone knows Unilever is India’s largest FMCG company. From 1987 to 2001, it owned and ran one of the world’s largest thermomete­r factories in Kodaikanal bordered by a watershed forest. In March 2001, the Pollution Control Board found hazardous waste rules had been violated. An appalled Unilever adopted the denial, closure, and litigation mode. This collapsed when rap song “Kodaikanal Won’t” created by an NGO went viral with 4 million views. Litigation lasted 15 years, ending with “settlement of an undisclose­d sum” to 511 workers. Ramya gives an account of gritty Unilever’s ultimate compromise.

Then there was US-owned Kodak’s inability to grasp the threat from digital technology. What went wrong at Kodak? Filmrolls sales nosedived; retail shelf-space shrank; a procession of 16 CEOs shuffled in and out; analogue surrendere­d to digital. 124 year-old Kodak exited its legacy business, and filed for bankruptcy in 2012. Another 18 brands grip Ramya’s book. Read it!

 ?? SHUTTERSTO­CK ?? Sweet like chocolate!
SHUTTERSTO­CK Sweet like chocolate!
 ??  ?? RE-BUILD Ramya Ramamurthy 420pp, ~599
Hachette
RE-BUILD Ramya Ramamurthy 420pp, ~599 Hachette

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India