Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Year on, victim’s father dissatisfi­ed with probe

MANY QUESTIONS UNANSWERED Says sleuths haven’t been able to answer several queries; CBI had nabbed the ‘prime accused’ in April

- Gaurav Bisht gaurav.bisht@hindustant­imes.com ■

SHIMLA: A year after the rape and murder of a teenaged girl in Kotkhai tehsil’s Hilaila village that shook Himachal Pradesh and became one of the reasons for the Virbhadra government’s ouster, the victim’s family feels dissatisfi­ed with the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion’s (CBI’s) probe that led to the arrest of a woodcutter.

Insisting on the involvemen­t of more than one person in the case, victim’s father, who is a farmer, says, “There is much more to it than meets the eye. The crime was not committed by just one person as being claimed by the investigat­ing agency.”

“There are many questions which still boggle my mind. I have confronted sleuths several times, but it’s painful that the investigat­ion has found only one man guilty. They still have not been able to answer where was my daughter’s body kept till it was found in the forest,” he adds.

“It has been a year and we pray each day that real culprits are put behind bars,” says victim’s sister, who however appears optimistic towards the government’s efforts in ensuring women safety in the state.

On July 4 last year, a girl studying in Government Senior Secondary School at Mahasu had gone missing from her way back home. Her naked body was two days later found in woods in Bankufar, close to Hilaila village. What turned out to be a rape and murder case triggered widespread protests across the state with infuriated public resorting to blocking roads and angry mob torching a police station in Kotkhai. A special investigat­ion team (SIT) was constitute­d by police to be led by inspector general of police Zahur Zaidi, which had arrested six suspects. But one of the initial suspect, Suraj Singh, on July 19 died in the police custody. Police claimed that Suraj died after a scuffle with another suspect in the lock-up.

Nine months ago, CBI took over the investigat­ion and regis- tered two FIRs — one in custodial death case and another in the rape and murder case. The CBI probe revealed that Suraj had died of police torture, which led to the arrest of entire SIT along with Zaidi and the then Shimla superinten­dent of police, DW Negi.

The SIT was charged with murder, wrongful confinemen­t to extort a confession and destructio­n of evidence.

A 40-member CBI team had

questioned more than 1,000 people and recorded statements of at least 400 of them. The investigat­ors had used DNA testing to zero in on suspects and put 250 people to test before arresting the ‘prime accused’, a 25-year-old woodcutter, Anil Kumar. His DNA samples had matched with the ones gathered from the spot where girl’s body was found.

Kumar’s family was put under technical and physical surveillan­ce. Anil, who was on run, had made a call to one of his family member, and that landed him in the police net. He was arrested from a village in Rohru subdivisio­n in April this year.

The CBI, however, claims that the investigat­ion in the case was on. “We have filed a chargeshee­t in the court and are still probing the case,” says CBI spokespers­on RK Gaur.

There is much more to it than meets the eye. The crime was not committed by just one person as being claimed by investigat­ors. VICTIM’S FATHER

 ?? REUTERS ?? ■ The case had triggered widespread protests across the state with angry mob torching a police station in Kotkhai.
REUTERS ■ The case had triggered widespread protests across the state with angry mob torching a police station in Kotkhai.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India