Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Inquiry by retired judge to get further delayed

- Hitender Rao letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH: The inquiry being conducted by a retired judge of the Punjab and Haryana high court, Justice RS Madan, into the land release of around 400 acres in Rohtak and grant of colonisati­on licence on 280 acres to real estate developer Uddar Gagan during the previous Congress regime is set to get delayed.

The Supreme Court is monitoring the matter.

A two month deadline was set by the state government for the completion of the inquiry ordered in June. However, Justice (retd) Madan sought an extension in time to complete the probe. Consequent­ly, the state government in July made a plea before the apex court for grant of three months to complete the proceeding­s.

But with the three-month extension also getting over in November, the retired judge has sought yet another extension in time.

He is also learnt to have conveyed his inability in getting the probe completed in a short span as the inquiry required summoning of many individual­s and scrutiny of a large number of documents.

The government has no option but to grant the extension, said an official.

The matter is listed before the bench of Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Indu Malhotra of the Supreme Court for October 26.

WHY PROBE IS IMPORTANT

The Supreme Court wanted the state government to probe the actions of those officials who illegally entertaine­d the applicatio­ns of Uddar Gagan and released the land to it when it had no title to the land on the date of the notificati­on under Section 4 and proceed against them in accordance with the law.

The apex court had in May 2016 upheld the land acquisitio­n process and ordered that land will vest in Haryana Urban Developmen­t Authority (HUDA) free from all encumbranc­es.

The SC ordered that all landreleas­e orders in favour of the builder in respect of land covered were quashed.

“Consequent­ly, all licences granted in respect of the land covered by acquisitio­n will stand transferre­d to HUDA,” the SC said.

“Justice RS Madan was appointed to carry out an inquiry and make complete recommenda­tions in two months to enable the government to carry out the directions of the apex court. An inquiry earlier conducted by IAS officer Rajan Gupta was not accepted by the state government,’’ said an official.

The inquiry conducted by Gupta had blamed the state government for assuming discretion­ary powers and its legal institutio­ns like the office of the legal remembranc­er (LR) supporting it by incorrectl­y interpreti­ng the law. However, the inquiry officer did not fix the responsibi­lity of any individual and concluded it to be a failure of the system. Chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar had on March 13 announced in the state assembly that the state government has decided to refer the Uddar Gagan matter to the CBI for investigat­ion.

However, the state government made a volte face by ordering an inquiry by a retired judge instead.

IN JULY, GOVT HAD URGED SC TO GRANT 3 MONTHS TO COMPLETE PROBE, MATTER TO BE HEARD BY COURT ON OCTOBER 26

GOVT INTENTIONS QUESTIONED BY ABHAY CHAUTALA

Leader of Opposition Abhay Chautala had questioned the motive behind the flip-flop terming it as contempt of the House. “The BJP government wanted to have a tailor-made inquiry which would suit their interests. Appointing a retired judge instead of referring the matter to CBI carried no value,’’ he had alleged.

THE CASE

Around 850 acres was proposed to be acquired in 2002 for residentia­l and commercial sectors in Rohtak by Haryana Urban Developmen­t Authority (HUDA).

However, the award was passed for about 422 acres in April 2005. A realtor, Uddar Gagan Properties Limited, in March 2005 entered into collaborat­ion agreements with some farmers whose land was under acquisitio­n for developmen­t of a colony.

The developer had applied for a licence to develop a colony on about 280 acres. The licences were granted by the town and country planning director in June 2006 and correspond­ing land was released from acquisitio­n. The licenses were addressed to the owners but remitted to the builder.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India