Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Victims can’t be left in lurch, says judge

MAHIPALPUR CASE A Delhi court pronounces death sentence on one and life term on another for killing two people during mob violence in the aftermath of the assassinat­ion of exPM Indira Gandhi

- Richa Banka richa.banka@htlive.com ■

Victims of ‘mass genocide could not be left in the lurch and that their allegation­s should also be given a fair hearing, the judge said.

NEWDELHI: Victims of ‘mass genocide could not be left in the lurch and that their allegation­s should also be given a fair hearing, a Delhi court observed on Tuesday while sentencing two convicts in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

Additional Sessions Judge Ajay Pandey noted that for 33 years the two men had escaped the process of law and said that it is time for the court to rise upon the cry of the victims and the demand of the society. The court awarded death penalty to convict Yashpal Singh for killing two men during the riots — the first capital punishment in the case. Co-convict Naresh Sehrawat was given life term.

Judge Pandey said from the testimony of the eyewitness­es, it is clear that Yashpal had come to the spot in the bus on November 1, 1984 and that he was actively involved in the burning of shops of the deceased and the eye witnesses. The court also pointed that there was sufficient material and allegation­s in the affidavit given by one of the eyewitness­es, Santokh Singh, who is also the complainan­t.

The judge said there is no material before it to consider that convict Yashpal had reformed himself. “He appears to be playing gimmick with the court and victims to date. He appears to be purposely hiding his income and properties,” the court said.

“The court is of the opinion that if he did not repent for 34 years and his mentality did not reform when he was at large in society for such a long period. He attempted to mislead the court in order to escape his liability, his chances for reformatio­n now are almost negligible,” the judge said.

While convicting the duo, the court has said that ‘fair trial should not be fair to only the accused persons. It also said that the accused had never been even arrested till the pronouncem­ent of their conviction on November 14. “The court recalls the feelings of the victims when the eyewitness­es appeared before the court on November 5 and expressed their grief that the convicts were roaming at large,” the judge said.

Stressing on the need for justice in such cases, the judge said such incidents break the trust between communitie­s which, once broken, cannot be restored, even after decades. “Incidents of this kind breaks entire fabric of trust and harmony against communitie­s, severely affecting the knitting and assimilati­on of different religious and social groups,” the court said.

The verdict was pronounced in Tihar Jail after the local police moved a petition in the high court citing security reasons and possibilit­y of attack on the convicts on the premises of the Delhi court, said a senior police officer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India