Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Herald land case: ED issues provisiona­l attachment orders

WHAT THE ORDER STATES Plot has been attached for a period of 180 days and the same shall not be transferre­d, disposed of, parted with or otherwise dealt with or without prior permission

- Jatinder Kaur Tur jatinder.tur@htlive.com ■

ON SATURDAY, CBI HAD FILED A CHARGESHEE­T AGAINST EX-CM HOODA, SENIOR CONG LEADER MOTILAL VOHRA AND ASSOCIATED JOURNALS LIMITED IN THE CASE

CHANDIGARH: A day after the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) filed a chargeshee­t against former chief minister (CM) Bhupinder Singh Hooda, senior Congress leader Motilal Vohra and Associated Journals Limited (AJL), in a case related to restoratio­n of an institutio­nal plot in Panchkula to AJL at old prices, the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e (ED), Chandigarh, issued a provisiona­l attachment order for the controvers­ial plot.

As per the provisiona­l attachment orders issued under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, the ED investigat­ions into the case concluded that the said plot is a crime proceed and is thus provisiona­lly attached for a period of 180 days and the same shall not be transferre­d, disposed of, parted with or otherwise dealt with or without prior permission.

The plot was allotted to AJL in 1982, but the same was resumed back by the estate officer, Haryana Urban Developmen­t Authority (HUDA) in October 1992 as the New Delhi-based private company, which was then run by Vohra, did not comply with the conditions of the allotment letter. The ED orders stated that Bhupinder

Singh Hooda, the then CM of Haryana and chairman of HUDA, had “blatantly misused his official position and dishonestl­y alloted the said plot afresh under the guise of re-allotment to AJL at the original rates in violation of necessary HUDA policy in 2005”.

Hooda has been accused of not

adhering to the legal opinion of Haryana’s legal remembranc­er and recommenda­tion of HUDA officers and financial commission­er of the town and country planning department. The ED orders also observed that the then CM thus caused a wrongful loss to HUDA and wrongful gain to AJL.

The provisiona­l attachment orders maintain that Bhupinder Singh Hooda did not stop here but further favoured the AJL by granting them three undue extensions for constructi­on of plot from May 1, 2008, to May 10, 2012, until the AJL completed the constructi­on in the year 2014.

The orders also maintained that if the plot is not attached under Section 5 of the PMLA nonattachm­ent of the same may result in frustratin­g further proceeding­s relating to confiscati­on of such proceeds of crime under the said act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India