Resolution on Azhar could be reworded under ‘compromise solution’ with China
WASHINGTON: Discussions are learnt to be underway to reach a compromise that would enable China to allow a UNSC committee to designate JeM founder Masood Azhar as a terrorist. The compromise would involve some changes in the language used to designate him as such. An outcome is expected within days, and not weeks and months, it has been reliably learnt.
But if these discussions fail, the three UNSC members, the United States, the United Kingdom and France, whose proposal to designate Azhar a global terrorist was temporarily blocked by China earlier this week, are said to be prepared to escalate the issue and push for a UNSC resolution, which would be debated and voted upon openly, in contrast to the confidential decision-making process of the council’s sanction committee.
Discussions are underway on certain changes that China is understood to have suggested in the language in which the designation is announced. The changes could be about words and phrases or about the need for more information in support of Azhar’s listing.
The three proposers appear willing to concede the changes in the interest of achieving the higher goal of designating Azhar, whose organization claimed responsibility for the terrorist attack in Pulwama in February, as a global terrorist.
There is a sense among people involved in the negotiations that China has shown flexibility and willingness to discuss the issue that it hadn’t before, and that has raised expectations about a compromise that could lead eventually to Azhar being sanctioned by the UN, enjoining member nations to not receive him as a visitor, or arm or fund him.
The UNSC press statement of February 22 condemning the Pulwama attack, which left at least 40 Central Reserve Police Force troopers dead, was taken as a sign of this new willingness stemming from Chinese frustration with Pakistan on this issue, which, it has been learnt, wasn’t lost on Islamabad.
When discussions started for the UNSC to issue a statement condemning the February 14 Pulwama attack, there was every expectation, it was leant, that China would block anything meaningful from coming out. Gradually, however, negotiators realized to their surprise that China was willing to go along and actually wanted to get to a yes, and it was just a matter of coming up with the right language. And the negotiators did get that language right.
The statement turned out to be “path-breaking” for India. It was for the first time that the UNSC had condemned a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir. And it also referred to the state by its official name, Jammu and Kashmir, and not Indian-administered Kashmir as it had been called by the world body before. Also, it was the first time that the UNSC had condemned a terrorist attack on Indian security forces in that state. And, finally, it named Jaish-e-Mohammad, which was intended to clear the way for designating its founder, Azhar.
It could not be immediately ascertained what was conceded to China in those negotiations.
It’s also not clear if these ongoing discussions are based on the proposal put on hold by China or whether a new proposal would be brought before the UNSC sanctions committee based on the compromise under discussion.
While these signs were noted and gave hope to negotiators about an eventual designation, China appears to have been in no hurry to get there. On Wednesday, it put a technical hold on the proposal, which can last six months, and then for another three months. Beijing has said it needs time.Its long and close relationship with Pakistan can, and will, be an issue, western powers acknowledge, but they are well past caring because of their frustration with Pakistan, a country seen around the world as a supporter of terrorism despite the financial aid it has received, and that it continues to seek/claim/ demand to tide over an economic crisis caused, in some estimates, by its generous support of terrorists. A UNSC resolution, on the other hand, will be deliberated in an open meeting, which will be aired live as are all open sessions. China will have to defend a terrorist, if and when a resolution is proposed to designate Azhar, under the gaze of the world and if chose to vote to defeat the motion, it will do so, again, in full public view.