Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

The global discourse on climate change is shifting

The government, along with businesses, must act. Or India could be seen as the villain, rather than the victim

- MUKUND GOVIND RAJAN Mukund Govind Rajan is chairman, ECube Investment Advisors, an ESG Fund The views expressed are personal

The internatio­nal community is beginning to ask searching questions about the role that developing countries play in the fight against climate change. India is the third-largest producer in the world of climate change-inducing greenhouse gas emissions, after China and the United States. At various internatio­nal fora, including the forthcomin­g Climate Action Summit called by the United Nations Secretary General next week, India’s actions to curb the growth of greenhouse gases will be under scrutiny.

India’s commitment­s under the Paris Climate Agreement, including the reduction of the carbon intensity of its GDP by 33-35% by 2030, and the generation of 40% of its energy from renewable sources, will in fact not yield a decline in greenhouse gas production. With the targeted economic expansion outlined in the recent Economic Survey, greenhouse gas production is slated to increase in India. Meanwhile, compensati­ng short-term goals set by the government, including the promise to create 100 GW of solar power capacity by 2022, appear very difficult to achieve given the current run-rate.

Unfortunat­ely, India’s growing emissions come at a time when the Intergover­nmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has concluded that global emissions need to fall by 45% from 1990 levels by 2030 to constrain the worst impacts of global warming. These effects — unbearable heat waves, extreme climatic events such as torrential rainfall as well as drought, changes in cropping patterns, and sea level rise — are already being felt across the globe. Cities such as Paris and New York, as well as the UK Parliament, have declared “climate emergencie­s”, and a green surge was visible in the recent European parliament­ary elections.

The responses that are taking shape include the European Commission’s Draft Rules for an European Union framework, which puts Environmen­t, Social and Governance considerat­ions at the heart of the financial system. These will soon require all asset managers to disclose the ESG performanc­e of their investment portfolios. Consequent­ly, corporates that are non-compliant on issues like reducing their carbon footprint will be progressiv­ely excluded from the investment portfolios of the largest fund managers in the world.

The recent action by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund to dump fossil fuel stocks is a sign of things to come. Guided by regulation, corporates in the developed countries will also start excluding from their supply chains companies in the developing world that are non-compliant with climate change mitigation standards. Likewise, on internatio­nal aid, statements from Britain’s Department for Internatio­nal Developmen­t indicate a relook at aid spending to incorporat­e measures like resilience to climate change and reducing environmen­tal harm.

It is only a matter of time before internatio­nal trade flows, and the levers they offer to influence the climate agenda, start receiving the attention of Western government­s.

The Indian government and the corporate sector are key stakeholde­rs who will have to work hard to defend India’s position. The government will rightly argue climate ethics — the unfairness of asking developing countries that have major developmen­tal challenges to embrace structural changes to solve the problem of climate change that has, at least in terms of legacy greenhouse gas emissions, been predominan­tly caused by the developed world. Indeed, on per capita emissions, India falls well over 100 places in the world rankings of biggest greenhouse gas producers. Hence the government’s emphasis on the “common but differenti­ated responsibi­lity” of developing countries. It will also highlight the gross inadequacy of financial flows and technology assistance from the developed countries to the developing countries. Grants, loans and project finance of $100 billion a year to tackle climate change have been long promised by developed countries, but only around 20% of this amount currently flows to developing countries.

The Indian corporate sector, meanwhile, must demonstrat­e greater resource use efficiency, and invest in both greenhouse gas mitigation and climate adaptation. Awareness is certainly increasing with events like the Chennai floods of 2015, which disrupted business continuity at some of India’s largest IT campuses, vividly bringing home the damage climate change can cause. Corporate India needs to step up its investment­s on R&D and innovation, in order to adapt to the disruptive changes ahead, and tap the opportunit­ies presenting themselves in emerging spaces like electric mobility, renewable energy, waste management, and green buildings.

We are in the midst of a climate emergency, which can stimulate irrational actions on the part of developed countries. India will have to substantia­lly enhance its focus on climate risks, and seek internatio­nal support. If the transition is not managed well, India could emerge as the villain of the piece, rather than one of the biggest victims of climate change.

 ??  ?? ■ The 2015 Chennai floods, which disrupted business continuity, showed the damage climate change can cause HT PHOTO
■ The 2015 Chennai floods, which disrupted business continuity, showed the damage climate change can cause HT PHOTO
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India