Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

How BJP challenged traditiona­l caste arithmetic in the 2 states

- Abhishek Jha letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEWDELHI: Elections to the legislativ­e assemblies of Maharashtr­a and Haryana will be held on October 21, the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced on Saturday.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is in government in both these states currently. And its current political dominance has to be traced back to the 2014 victory of the BJP under the leadership of Narendra Modi. It has performed consistent­ly well in the last three major elections held in these states. (See Chart 1)

The BJP’s success in the two states is also a story of careful social engineerin­g which has defied traditiona­l caste arithmetic. When the BJP won assembly elections in 2014, it chose chief ministers who did not come from the dominant social groups in both Haryana and Maharashtr­a. Manohar Lal Khattar was a nonJat chief minister of Haryana after a very long time. Similarly, Devendra Fadnavis, who is a Brahmin, was a non-Maratha chief minister in Maharashtr­a after a long time.

Post-poll data from the 2019 National Election Study conducted by Centre for the Study of Developing Societies(CSDS)-Lokniti shows that the BJP and its allies were ahead of the Congress-led alliance among most social groups excluding religious minorities in these states. (See Chart 2)

To be sure, the two poll-bound states are drasticall­y different in terms of demography.

While Scheduled Tribe (ST) voters have a 12% population share in Maharashtr­a, they do not even comprise 1% voters in Haryana. Haryana is also one of the states with the lowest share of Muslim population in the country.

However, almost 30% of Haryana’s population belongs to Scheduled Caste (SC), compared to 17% in Maharashtr­a. (See Chart 3)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India