Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

Civil society can help to co-design cities

- Rohini Nilekani Rohini Nilekani is chairperso­n, Arghyam. The piece is adapted from a keynote address for an E-Gov Foundation webinar The views expressed are personal

This year, I have been from Bengaluru to Kabini and back several times. Every time I return from the forest and the rural countrysid­e, my eyes and senses hit refresh, and I see my home city with a new perspectiv­e.

The overwhelmi­ng impression is of a metro undergoing a painful renewal. Masses of threatenin­g concrete overhead, piles of rubble underneath. And through this grey canvas, dots of colour as hapless citizens weave through the traffic, without proper visibility or signposts, navigating past trucks and haulers, moody traffic signals and perplexing roundabout­s.

It feels as if Bengaluru, like so many other cities in India, is testing its residents. The unfinished infrastruc­ture is a poster promise of a better future. The city demands patience, demands faith, demands hope. The residents experience resignatio­n, weariness, and a lasting numbness.

When I finally get home, I enter an urban version of the forest I left behind — my neighbourh­ood has a dense canopy of trees. Yet Bengaluru is not homogenous, and my sylvan surroundin­gs are an anomaly now in the erstwhile garden city. It has a criss-cross of diverse identities and designs. It has layers and layers of privilege on top and tiers of disenfranc­hisement below. Yet, the dysfunctio­nality of the city creates a perverse equaliser. It brings an end to the secession of the elite. Our bubble breaks with the chaos of the traffic, the pervasive pollution and limitation­s on personal spaces.

But there are now new opportunit­ies to engage with the city’s future.

All over India, there are efforts inviting citizens to re-imagine belonging. To make the city their own. The discourse has firmly shifted from whether the city should grow to how it should grow and change, and who should participat­e in the change-making.

Today’s technologi­es enable mass participat­ion in civic design. In metropolit­an areas and beyond, digital-age civil society organisati­ons (CSOs), often helmed by creative young leaders, use tech-enabled design to challenge the supremacy of the State in urban futures. Thriving Residents’ Welfare

Associatio­ns (RWAs) and dynamic CSOs seem determined to take back their city.

For example, during the lockdown, Yugantar filed a Right to Informatio­n (RTI) petition to find the total number of slums and their population in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporatio­n. This data was then shared with local NGOs to better target relief work. Haiyya, through a local campaign called Health over Stigma, helped hold service providers accountabl­e for providing safe, nonjudgmen­tal sexual and reproducti­ve health services, especially for unmarried women. Reap Benefit in Bengaluru has developed an open civic platform that comprises a WhatsApp chatbot, a web app and a civic forum. The chatbot guides users with simplified steps through a variety of civic challenges that are engaging and fun. If you see a pothole on the road, you can send photos, but go beyond reporting to next steps. A friendly technology helps convert agitation i nto action and turn bystanders into stewards.

Civis understand­s that technical environmen­tal legislatio­n can sometimes bypass civil society, even though we are all heavily impacted by environmen­tal degradatio­n. In March 2020, a draft notificati­on with radical new rules was put up by the environmen­t ministry for public consultati­on. Civis put up a simplified version and more people were able to directly participat­e in the consultati­on.

We must encourage these and many other samaaj-based efforts. More importantl­y, we must each find our own way to participat­e in these ventures. Democracy cannot be a spectator sport. Good governance must be co-created, not just consumed. No matter who you are, you are first a citizen. Even if you head a government department or a successful business — you remain a citizen first, a part of your community. And I believe it is only the samaaj and institutio­ns of the samaaj that can hold the State accountabl­e to the larger public interest of making our cities more livable for all.

Luckily, today’s new technologi­es allow us to participat­e more effectivel­y with relative ease. I am not talking about simple clicktivis­m, but how a tech-enabled, societal ecosystem can distribute the ability to solve; can democratis­e civic engagement; and can help people co-create their city’s future.

However, there is an important caution here. We need civil society itself to get more digital in the digital age. Especially because only an engaged digital samaaj can keep tech corporatio­ns more accountabl­e and prevent them from unleashing tools that distort the political and democratic process or reduce individual and collective agency. Urban movements are critical for this cause.

The pandemic has forced us to speed up our thinking on what cities should look like in the future. Citizens now have more opportunit­ies to take active part in building urban resilience. Young leaders are creating more options for empowered citizens to co-create more humane environmen­ts. When we return to the city from the forest, we should feel a buzz, not a burn.

 ?? HTPHOTO ?? Citizens now have more opportunit­ies to take active part in building urban resilience
HTPHOTO Citizens now have more opportunit­ies to take active part in building urban resilience
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India