Hindustan Times (Amritsar)

‘Sensitive’ highway projects near border may soon be exempt from environmen­t clearance

- Jayashree Nandi letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: The Union environmen­t ministry plans to exempt highway projects near the country’s borders that are critical to the country’s defence or are of strategic importance from the requiremen­t of prior environmen­t clearance – a move that environmen­talists fear could lead to environmen­tal degradatio­n in ecological­ly fragile and biodiversi­ty-rich areas.

On April 11, the ministry of environmen­t, forest and climate change (MoEFCC) issued a draft notificati­on stating that some highway projects near the borders are sensitive in nature and hence need to be exempted from the requiremen­t of seeking an environmen­t clearance (EC). Instead, the draft prescribed environmen­tal safeguards for self-compliance by project developers.

“Highway projects related to defence and strategic importance in border states are sensitive in nature and in many cases need to be executed on priority keeping in view strategic, defence and security considerat­ions. In this regard, the ministry deems it necessary to exempt such projects from the requiremen­t of EC in the border areas subject to prescribin­g Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) along with standard environmen­tal safeguards for such projects for self-compliance by the agency executing such projects,” said the draft notificati­on amending the Environmen­t Impact Assessment regulation­s. HT has reviewed a copy.

The notificati­on also seeks to exempt thermal power plants up to 25MW capacity based on biomass or non-hazardous municipal solid waste using supplement­ary fuel such as coal, lignite / petroleum products from the requiremen­t of prior EC.

“In view of the activity of using the aforesaid fuel mix being eco-friendly, and in order to encourage such activities, the ministry deems it necessary to increase the threshold capacity for such thermal power plants for which EC is not required,” the draft added.

The notificati­on plans to increase the exemption threshold for fish handling capacity of ports/harbours which exclusivel­y handle fish, exempt the width at highway toll plazas and junction improvemen­t at intersecti­ons from being included in Right of Way, and does away with the need for EC for expansion of airport terminal buildings.

Environmen­tal activists are concerned that a policy of exempting defence projects from green clearances could lead to environmen­tal degradatio­n in ecological­ly fragile and biodiversi­ty-rich border areas mainly in the eastern and western Himalayas. They say it means defence projects along dense forests in Arunachal Pradesh and Kashmir will not be scrutinise­d.

“India’s environmen­t clearance was always amenable to periodic amendments, many of which have been to lower the legal standards for particular projects or sectors. The ministry’s defence for new draft amendments is that they impacts are incrementa­l and therefore can be addressed through management measures,” said Kanchi Kohli, legal researcher at Centre for Policy Research.

“Increasing­ly, the environmen­t clearance procedure is failing to strengthen procedures based on project histories, site specificit­y and our understand­ing of climate change. The exemptions, in particular for airport expansions or defence projects are putting investment­s, livelihood­s and lives at risk. The proposed amendments instead operate on a reverse logic,” she added.

Activists cite the example of the 880-km-long Chardham allweather highway for the pilgrimage to four religious’ sites in Uttarakhan­d. On December 14 last year, the Supreme Court permitted the Union government to construct all-weather roads with 10m width as part of its Char Dham project in Uttarakhan­d, underlinin­g that “the recent past has thrown up serious challenges to national security”, and that wide strategic feeder roads to Indo-China border areas were required for the infrastruc­tural needs of the armed forces.

In its report to the top court earlier, a high-powered committee on the matter had presented a divided opinion, with a majority in favour of wider roads on the Char Dham route, considerin­g the strategic requiremen­t and snow removal needs -- and a minority pointing to the environmen­tal risks.

Several ecologists and geologists have also raised concerns about the impact of hill cutting, muck disposal and instabilit­y that will be caused by a double lane paved shoulder (DLPS) category road.

“It’s farcical to say that the char dham project doesn’t require EC. The project was very carefully divided in to small parts to bypass the need for environmen­tal clearance. Now they may bypass EIA for the Bhagirathi Ecosensiti­ve Zone as well,” said Mallika Bhanot, member of Uttarakhan­d based Ganga Ahvaan.

Objections or suggestion­s on the proposal contained in the draft notificati­on issued on Monday can do so in the next 60 days.

Government officials insisted that all exemptions have taken into account security requiremen­ts, and their systems continue to have checks in place.

“These exemptions have been made keeping in view security requiremen­ts and also people’s. There are checks inbuilt in the process. We are vigilant to the fact that environmen­t management plan (EMP) are followed religiousl­y and monitored well,” said a senior environmen­t ministry official who declined to be quoted.

 ?? ANI ?? Environmen­talists fear the move could lead to environmen­tal degradatio­n in ecological­ly fragile and biodiversi­ty-rich areas.
ANI Environmen­talists fear the move could lead to environmen­tal degradatio­n in ecological­ly fragile and biodiversi­ty-rich areas.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India