Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

Municipali­ties must compensate owners for shamlat land, rules HC

- Surender Sharma surender.sharma@hindustant­imes.com

HARYANA VERDICT ‘HUGE FOR FARMERS’; TO HAVE RAMIFICATI­ONS IN PUNJAB AS WELL

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held that village merger in a municipali­ty does not divest the identifiab­le villagers of ownership of common land (shamlat land) and civic bodies will have to compensate owners to use such land. The order will have ramificati­ons in Punjab too even as the verdict was on 100 odd petitions by residents of Haryana.

The judgment from a fivejudge bench presided over by justice SS Saron came on bunch of petitions, challengin­g provisions of Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, and Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, which provided that if a gram panchayat is included in a municipali­ty, it shall cease to exist and its assets and liabilitie­s shall vest in the municipali­ty.

The petitioner­s had argued that without paying compensati­on for the village common land (shamlat), it could not be transferre­d to municipali­ties. Detailed judgment is awaited.

“It is a landmark victory for farmers. Their rights on village common land, which illegally were usurped by the state, have been resurrecte­d by the high court,” senior advocate Puneet Bali and advocate Vibhav Jain, who appeared on behalf of some petitioner­s, said.

The high court also ruled that the Jumla Mushtarka Malkan land of villages merged into the civic bodies also belong to its proprietor­s and municipali­ties would have to pay compensati­on for its acquisitio­n. Jumla Mushtarka Malkan is a variety of common land created during consolidat­ion after applying a pro-rata cut on the holdings of proprietor­s under the Consolidat­ion Act.

The management and control of such land vests in a gram panchayat whereas ownership continues to vest in proprietor. The provisions of these two Acts were challenged initially in 2001 and as government included more and more villages into civic bodies, by 2013 over 100 petitions were filed.

In September 2013, high court division bench of then justice Rajive Bhalla had referred the matter for considerat­ion of a five judges’ bench stating that matter was of general public importance. Shamlat land came to vest in a gram panchayat, under Section 2(g), read with sections 3 and 4 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, as applicable to the Haryana as well.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India