Plea to arrest ex-CRPF officer Dhillon quashed by Canadian court

TORONTO: A Canadian court has dismissed a plea by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) for summons or an arrest warrant to be issued against a retired senior cop from India, on the grounds that his presence in the country had not been “sufficiently proven” by the hardline activist group.

Tejinder Singh Dhillon, who retired as a senior officer of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and was first denied entry into Canada and then returned to the country courtesy a fresh visa and air ticket provided by its High Commission in New Delhi, is learnt to have left the country for India. Dhillon left from Toronto airport on Sunday night while he had been scheduled to depart on Monday.

Since Dhillon was en route to Delhi, he was unavailable for comment on his decision to curtail his stay in Canada.

However, that may have been precipitated by the private prosecution initiated SFJ on Friday. The case came up before the Ontario Court of Justice in Toronto on Monday, which did not issue either a summons or an arrest warrant, noting that Dhillon’s presence in Canada had not been “sufficiently proved.”

Gurpatwant Pannun, legal advisor to SFJ, said, “It is travesty of justice that we were asked to prove Dhillon’s presence in the country while (the) Indian police officer was brought back to Toronto by the (Justin) Trudeau government on Canada’s expense after issuing a public apology.”

Pannun said SFJ will appeal the decision: “We are filing an application under Access to Information Act to get the official records of Dhillon’s entry and exit in Canada from CSBA (Canadian Border Services Agency).”

Pannun alleged, “With evidence in hand, there are reasonable grounds to believe that during Dhillon’s tenure as DIG Jalandhar range, Sikh nationalists were tortured under his command for propagating Khalistan. We seek his arrest warrants so he could face trial in Canada for the crime of commanding and counselling torture.”

PLEA WAS DISMISSED ON GROUNDS THAT DHILLON’S PRESENCE IN THE COUNTRY HAD NOT BEEN ‘SUFFICIENTLY PROVEN’ BY THE SFJ