Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

U’khand doesn’t want to be Ganga’s guardian

- Soibam Rocky Singh rocky.singh@hindustant­imes.com

The BJP government in Uttarakhan­d has moved the Supreme Court to relieve it of the duty of being the legal guardian of the Ganga and Yamuna rivers.

Challengin­g a three-monthold verdict of Uttarakhan­d high court declaring the Ganga and Yamuna living entities, bestowing on them same legal rights as a person, the state government contended that the verdict as “unsustaina­ble in the law” and had various legal repercussi­ons.

The plea asked that in case of human casualties in a flood, can the affected people file suit for damages against the chief secretary of the state and as to whether state government would be liable to bear such financial burden.

The March 20 judgment of HC allowed the director general of Namami Gange project, Uttarakhan­d chief secretary and advocate general the right to represent the Ganga in a view to help in efforts to clean the polluted rivers. The Namami Gange is the Narendra Modi government’s ambitious plan that brings together various efforts for cleaning and conserving the river.

The petition also pointed out that HC erred in not considerin­g that Ganga and Yamuna are inter-state rivers and these rivers flows in other different states.

The state government asked what would be the role of its chief secretary, who has been declared by HC as loco parentis (local guardian) to the rivers, if there arises any dispute in respect any kind of different illegaliti­es being committed in other states.

“As per the provisions under item no. 56 of the union list of the 7th Schedule (Article 246) of the Constituti­on, it is the sole constituen­t right of the Union Government to frame out the rule for efficaciou­s management of all the inter-state rivers,” it said.

Terming the verdict as “unsustaina­ble in the law”, the Uttarakhan­d government contended that HC went beyond its jurisdicti­on in passing the verdict, as no pleading was made to declare the rivers as living entities.

It argued that the issue before the HC was only with regard to removal of encroachme­nts from the Shakti Canal on the Yamuna in Dehradun district. “There is no dispute that river Ganga and Yamuna and other tributarie­s in India are having social impacts, and they support and assist both the life and natural resources and health and well being of the entire community,” the petition said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India