Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

Sebi imposes trading curbs on 331 suspected shell companies

Regulator says decision based on MCA letter, asks stock exchanges to audit the firms

- Jayshree P Upadhyay Jayshree.u@livemint.com

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Monday directed stock exchanges to initiate action against 331 listed entities suspected of being shell companies. Of them, 162 were actively traded; 169 had already been suspended.

Some of these companies immediatel­y protested against the regulator’s move, pointing to their operating and dividendpa­ying track record, and said they would seek a legal opinion.

According to a notificati­on by Sebi, the shares of these companies will be traded only once a month until stock exchanges ascertain whether these are genuine companies or structures meant for fund diversion and tax evasion. The exchanges have been asked to independen­tly audit these firms, and if necessary, appoint a forensic auditor.

Markets fell after the announceme­nt. The BSE’s 30-share Sensex closed down 259.48 points, or 0.8%, at 32,014.19 points. The Nifty fell 78.85 points, or 0.78%, lower at 9,978.55 points.

Sebi’s communique said the regulator had based its decision on a letter from the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) identifyin­g these 331 firms. It is not immediatel­y clear how the MCA shortliste­d these firms; the list of firms released by the ministry mentions that the income-tax department, serious fraud investigat­ion office and early warning systems played a role.

“These companies were identified by a panel formed by government of India post-demonetisa­tion. The 331 firms saw high investment­s through layering and fund flows from non-listed shell firms,” said a ministry official on condition of anonymity.

Out of the 331 companies, 162 were actively traded on BSE Ltd (the rest were suspended due to penal reasons) and 48 were traded on the NSE. The total public float of the 331 companies, according to the BSE, is ₹12,000 crore. At least 13 firms had a market capitalisa­tion of more than ₹300 crore each.

Sebi capped upward price movement at the level of the lasttraded price for these stocks. Any buyers will have to make a deposit equal to double the value of the trade.

At least 162,000 companies that have not been carrying out business activities have been deregister­ed and actions are being taken against shell firms, finance minister Arun Jaitley told the Lok Sabha on July 21, according to a Press Trust of India report.

The Companies Act and the Sebi Act do not define shell companies, although the income-tax department raises red flags when it notices certain patterns such as negligible business activity and unclear beneficial ownership.

Experts questioned the process which Sebi followed for banning these firms.

“Shell companies are not defined under any law so the basis of calling these companies shell is not clear. Even if (they are) shell (firms), if they do not violate any law, Sebi should not be taking what is clearly punitive and pre-emptive action, even without a hearing,” said Sandeep Parekh, founder of law firm Finsec Law Advisors. “The vagueness in identifyin­g these companies as shell extends to naming a company which is involved in the Mumbai Metro project and nearly a dozen other operating and profitable companies.”

In a notice to exchanges, Parsvnath Developers Ltd, one of the 331 firms, said it was “one of the largest real estate developmen­t firms in Northern India”.

“We are not a shell company and suspicion is uncalled for. We are seeking legal advice in the matter and we are approachin­g the regulator, ie Sebi, requesting it to recall its directions,” said J Kumar Infraproje­cts Ltd.

Prakash Industries Ltd, Pincon Spirit Ltd and SQS India BFSI Ltd also sent exchange notices expressing shock and pointing to their operating track record.

Sebi’s action may have been aimed at protecting investors, said one expert. “This is to protect shareholde­rs’ interest keeping in mind that in many such places, promoter shareholdi­ng may be disguised as public shareholdi­ng and retail investors fall in a trap,” said JN Gupta, co-founder and MD, Stakeholde­r Empowermen­t Services, a proxy advisory firm.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India