Padmavati gets nod for release but as Padmavat

‘NO CUTS’ Film to get UA certificate, CBFC suggest four other modifications

MUMBAI/NEWDELHI/JAIPUR: The censor board on Saturday said it would clear controversial Bollywood film Padmavati after suggesting five major modifications, including changing the title to Padmavat, but the move failed to pacify Rajput groups that allege the movie distorts history.

A fringe group warned of vandalising cinema halls if the ~150crore movie was released and Vishvaraj Singh, a descendent of the royal family of Mewar, called the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) “ignoble and unprofessional”.

The CBFC agreed to clear Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmavati with a U/A certificate and asked the filmmakers to put in a disclaimer that the movie does not claim historical accuracy and does not in any way subscribe to or seek to glorify Jauhar — the banned practice of a widow throwing herself on to her husband’s funeral pyre.

The suggestions also included changing any incorrect and misleading reference to historical places, and modifications to a song in the film in which a Ghoomar dance is performed.

The censor board’s certificate will be issued once these changes are made and the movie re-examined.

Joshi reportedly said that filmmakers had agreed to the CBFC’S suggestions, but no official comment was issued by Viacom18. A meeting is reportedly on the cards between the filmmakers and censor board officials in January. “This was an unprecedented and tough situation. I am glad that following a balanced approach we resolved the task at hand in a pragmatic and positive manner,” CBFC chief Prasoon

Joshi said.

The board took the decision after its examining committee and a special advisory panel met on December 28 to review the film featuring actor Deepika Padukone as Rajput queen Padmavati.

The film is based on Padmavat, a 16th-century poem written by Sufi poet Malik Muhammad Jayasi, who gives an account of a Rajput queen of Chittor who chooses to kill herself rather than be captured by Delhi ruler Alauddin Khilji.

Historians are divided about whether the queen existed, but many Rajputs believe she did and accuse Bhansali of portraying her in a bad light. Rajput groups were angry that the movie allegedly contained a romantic scene between the queen and Khilji, who had attacked the Mewar capital of Chittorgarh.

The Shri Rajput Karni Sena, a fringe outfit that made dire threats against the film’s cast and disrupted shooting in January, reacted with caution to the censor board’s decision.