Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

Compensate Ludhiana woman for failed sterilisat­ion surgery, govt hospital told

- Press Trust of India letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI : The apex consumer commission has allowed a Ludhiana woman compensati­on for two failed sterilisat­ion procedures under a free priority programme of the government conducted in 1994 and 1998.

Though the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) did not record it as a case of medical negligence, it observed that defence of ‘free services’ cannot be construed to imply non-accountabi­lity.

Baljinder Kaur had undergone the procedure of tubectomy twice in a government hospital. The first unsuccessf­ul attempt led to an abortion whereas the second failed procedure resulted in her getting pregnant again.

The commission, while noting that the litigation has taken over one and a half decades, directed the civil hospital, where Kaur had undergone the two surgeries, to compensate her as per the existing government guidelines regarding such failed procedures. The compensati­on limit provided in cases of failed tubectomy operation is Rs 30,000.

The commission also directed the hospital to give compensati­on individual­ly for each of the two failed tubectomie­s with an interest of 10% on the amount from the respective dates of failure in 1994 and 1998.

“The ends of justice will be met, and the equities will be balanced, with the civil hospital, Payal through its senior/chief medical officer/superinten­dent ensuring that all (repeat all) compensati­on etc, provided by the state government as per the extant (repeat extant) guidelines and policy in respect of each of the two failed procedures, individual­ly, is paid to the complainan­ts with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the respective dates of failure till actual payment(s),” NCDRC presiding member S M Kantikar said.

“We may but explicitly remark that defence of free services cannot be construed to imply carte blanche for medical negligence or non-accountabi­lity,” the commission said.

The district forum had in 2005 dismissed Kaur’s complaint saying she was not a consumer as the services for sterilisat­ion were free. The Punjab consumer commission had also dismissed the plea.the NCDRC observed that earlier sterilisat­ion procedures in government hospitals were conducted in huge volumes and with limited means.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India