Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

At mosque site, a hope for amity

- Sunetra Choudhury letters@hindustant­imes.com ■ ■

DHANIPUR VILLAGE(ROUNAHI): Last weekend, days before the cornerston­elaying ceremony for a Ram temple, the administra­tion of Ayodhya fulfilled another aspect of the November 2019 Supreme Court verdict that cleared the way for the shrine to be built. About 30 kilometres away from what was once a disputed site, five acres of land was handed over to the Indo-islamic Cultural Foundation on Saturday for the constructi­on of a mosque.

While the Shri Ram Janmabhoom­i Teerth Kshetra Trust is preparing for the formal launch of the temple, members of the fledgeling foundation are yet to meet , leave alone draw up a plan for the kind of structure they want to build “Please don’t compare us to them,’’ said Athar Hussain, a spokespers­on for the foundation. “They have had decades to plan for the temple and we were only informed that we would have to plan for an alternativ­e site in November last year. By the time they identified the Dhannipur land for us, Covid hit us and so we haven’t even had a physical meeting just yet. ‘’

The Indo-islamic Cultural Foundation, spearheade­d by the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board, may not have firmed up a plan for a mosque in lieu of the of the Babri Masjid that was demolished in 1992 but it does have some ideas . “The new mosque may be around the same size as the Babri masjid, but the land allotment is much larger and so we want to make sure that we play a much larger role in the community,”’ said Hussain. “We are planning to have a hospital to take care of the health needs and also, a museum and a research centre in the area.’’

For the 9,000 odd residents of Rounahi township, the attention it is attracting is all very new. District officials say they were bound by the court order to allot land that would be within the Ayodhya city limits and would sit harmonious­ly with its surroundin­gs. Rounahi fit the bill because of its predominan­tly Muslim population and its accessibil­ity, just off the Lucknow-faizabad highway. “Earlier we were famous for this mazaar which hosts a threeday mela every year in April,’’ said resident Sohrah Khan. “10,000 people would head here for the qawwalis, the horse racing and other festivitie­s.’’

And now, Khan is hoping, Rounahi gets the same kind attention and developmen­t that Ayodhya does. That’s the best that most of its agrarian residents can hope for. The allotted land is now a lush green area, covered by rice paddy and come Wednesday, many of the farmer residents are hoping that the foundation-stone laying ceremony for the Ram temple means an end to the bitterness that marked the dispute over the site.

Being 30 kilometres away, there’s no one who has offered prayers at the original Babri masjid, but there are those who followed the legal dispute and came away disappoint­ed.

“We all know the reality of why this moque had to come here,’’ said farmer Naim Khan.

That’s a sentiment that many others echoed. Like Abdul Khaliq, a resident of Ayodhya who was also involved in the court case. Khaliq, unlike litigant Iqbal Ansari, refuses to accept the land swap for the mosque.

“They took advantage of the fact that we in the Muslim side said we would accept whatever the Supreme Court said,’’ he said. “That’s fine. But I don’t have to accept this five acres. I don’t care what happens to that land.’’ Another litigant, Haji Meboob, too said that he wasn’t supportive of the decision to accept the land.

These sentiments reflect the deep divide in the community over the resolution of the dispute. “A new mosque was never asked from the Supreme Court,’’ said lawyer MR Shamshad. “A constituti­onal issue was finally decided by granting restitutio­n. This is not justice, and hence the community had taken the stand to distance themselves from the land.’’

 ?? HT PHOTO ?? The mosque site in Dhannipur village near Ayodhya town.
HT PHOTO The mosque site in Dhannipur village near Ayodhya town.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India