Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

Panel quizzes officials on OTT

- Deeksha Bhardwaj letters@ hindustant­imes. com

NEW DELHI: The parliament­ary panel on informatio­n technology on Wednesday asked the ministry of informatio­n broadcasti­ng (I&B) how it plans to regulate OTT platforms, people familiar with the matter said. “The regulation was a concern for some MPS,” said a person familiar with the matter. “There is no easy solution on how to regulate OTT platforms. It is a very complex issue as a single algorithm may also not work.”

The ministry on November 11 decided to bring OTT platforms streaming films and other entertainm­ent programmes, as well as digital news and current affairs content, under its ambit. OTT platforms include entertainm­ent websites such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hotstar, Sonyliv, Zee5 and Eros Now. The ministry faced backlash due to its move, with many arguing that it would lead to unnecessar­y censorship of content. HT reached out to the spokespers­on of the ministry but did not receive a response immediatel­y.

The panel on Wednesday met the representa­tives of the I&B ministry and CBFC (it functions under the ministry) on the “Review of functionin­g of Central Board of Film Certificat­ion (CBFC)”. Officials from both the department­s, including CBFC chairperso­n Prasoon Joshi, attended the meeting.

Another concern for MPS, including panel chairperso­n Shashi Tharoor and TMC parliament­arian Mahua Moitra, was that why there should be censorship in the first place. “The issue was raised by (independen­t MP) Sumalatha Ambareesh,” said the person quoted above. “She suggested that a warning be given or appropriat­e certificat­ion be awarded instead. Why should the scenes be cut by the CBFC instead?”

Officials from the CBFC, however, said censorship was necessary keeping in mind the sensitivit­ies of people. “Violence, coarse language, nudity, all need to be flagged. CBFC officials said that most people who are given such warnings normally censor the content on their own,” said a second person familiar with the matter.

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said “under the Constituti­on, freedom of expression is provided with reasonable restrictio­ns,” the second person said.

Congress MP Karti Chidambara­m, said the first person mentioned above, questioned the validity of an overarchin­g mechanism to regulate OTT platforms. “He (Karti) was of the view that there is no-one-sizefits-all solution to the matter. VPNS can be changed and the vast amount of content available may regulated with great difficulty,” the first person said.

Ambareesh, Moitra, Dubey and Chidambara­m are all part of the panel.

Another issue raised was that while OTT platforms could broadcast films with certain liberties, the same were censored for movies released in theatres. “While one film may get a certificat­e for being on an OTT platform, another is denied the same permission for being released in a theatre,” the first person said.

The person added that CBFC officials responded to the issue by making a distinctio­n between collective and private viewing. “They said that what may be appropriat­e for private viewing may not necessaril­y be appropriat­e in collective space,” the first person said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India