Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

The budget boosts hopes of revival

The plans are largely within the government’s control. By focusing on a few objectives, it has perhaps achieved more

- Govind Sankaranar­ayanan Govind Sankaranar­ayanan, a former COO and CFO of Tata Capital, is currently vice chairman at ESG Fund Ecube Investment Advisor The views expressed are personal

There is nothing that sharpens the mind quite as much as a crisis. This was reflected in the brevity and precision of finance minister (FM) Nirmala Sitharaman’s budget speech, which was one-third shorter than her speech last year.

The budget signals where the government’s priorities lie. This government, in its fight against Covid-19, has had to bear the brunt of 70 years of underspend­ing on health care. It has unsurprisi­ngly focused on the sector through an expansion of expenditur­e on health and nutrition from ₹94,000 crore to over ₹2.2 lakh crore. As recommende­d by many economists, the budget provides a strong Keynesian stimulus. There is a significan­t enhancemen­t of allocation to existing water supply and sanitation programmes. Highways and metro rail constructi­on projects were prominent within the first 30 minutes of the FM’S speech. The common theme running through these sectors is that old-fashioned constructi­on spending, funded by a capital expenditur­e programme, up from ₹4 lakh crore to over ₹5.5 lakh crore, should create a degree of demand transmissi­on.

High-value infrastruc­ture creation requires financial institutio­ns to manage flows of capital. There is a proposal to create an Infrastruc­ture Developmen­t Financial Institutio­n to fill the space that was once occupied by IDBI, IFCI and IDFC. There is also an understand­ing that some markets will not develop unless the government steps in to create basic infrastruc­ture. The proposal to create a market-making entity for investment grade bonds and the removal of tax restrictio­ns on INVITS (infrastruc­ture investment trusts) and REITS (real estate investment trusts) aims to address bottleneck­s within these markets.

The government also needs to bring public sector banks, with non-performing assets (NPAS), back to the lending fold. It is addressing this reluctance to lend with the creation of a monolithic asset reconstruc­tion company. This has a certain appeal. The Troubled Asset Relief Program in the United States, after the Lehman crisis, ultimately succeeded in recovering nearly 100% of its asset value. There is a logical belief that moving NPAS into such an entity will free banks to return to credit provision. What needs to be ensured is that these assets are transferre­d in a transparen­t manner at the right value, which does not paper over the true NPA levels of the selling banks. The budget recognises that India’s problems are uniquely messy and require a preparedne­ss to compromise on small inefficien­cies. The reduction of tax audits for small companies, a commitment to not reopen income tax assessment­s after three years, and the simplifica­tion of tax filing for senior citizens may not make a difference to the economy as a whole, but helps focus state capacity in areas that are more useful.

A consequenc­e of this overall approach is move into a high-deficit regime. This year’s fiscal deficit of 9.5% is the highest since the 1991 crisis, and the government will be living with deficits of at least 4% until 2025-26. This is a dramatic commitment from the government to prime the pump of the economy. There was a fear that, faced with a crisis, the government would resort to an aggressive taxation programme which would stifle demand. Through a Marshall Plan-like commitment to spending on infrastruc­ture and health expenditur­e, and yet largely permitting private sector animal spirits (such as they remain after Covid-19) to remain intact, the government has balanced some very difficult priorities.

The plans articulate­d in the budget are largely within the government’s control. This is in contrast to budgets that focus on reduction in duties, offering tax breaks or steps to attract capital — all of which depend on the response of the private sector. To that extent, one can feel a little more confident about the successful consummati­on of the activities in this budget. In the budget, by focusing on a few objectives, the government has perhaps achieved more.

 ?? REUTERS ?? Through a Marshall Plan-like commitment to spending on infrastruc­ture and health expenditur­e, and yet largely permitting private sector animal spirits (such as they remain after Covid-19) to remain intact, the government has balanced some very difficult priorities
REUTERS Through a Marshall Plan-like commitment to spending on infrastruc­ture and health expenditur­e, and yet largely permitting private sector animal spirits (such as they remain after Covid-19) to remain intact, the government has balanced some very difficult priorities
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India