Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

In aiming to win the war, Google and Facebook lose a battle

- David Fickling Bloomberg Opinion The views expressed are personal

When prospector­s made what was the biggest oil discovery in history at the Spindletop well in Texas in 1901, the world’s premier oil monopolist was absent from the scene. Standard Oil Co was content to sit back and let smaller local rivals establish themselves.

That’s a good analogy for the deals Google is striking with News Corp. and Australian newspaper publishers, ahead of planned legislatio­n there to enhance the bargaining power of news businesses in negotiatin­g with online platforms. Facebook is taking a more extreme approach, announcing that it would quit distributi­ng news from Australian publishers, and to Facebook news feeds in the country, altogether.

John D Rockefelle­r didn’t much care who produced America’s oil, as long as he had a strangleho­ld on piping, refining and distributi­ng it. Google is little different. By granting a boon to publishers, erstwhile rivals in the online advertisin­g industry, it’s hoping to keep its hands on a far richer prize — scarcely challenged control and distributi­on of the world’s online informatio­n. Facebook, by refusing to compromise, is working towards the same end.

The core of what the country’s antitrust regulator had sought from Google and Facebook was a levelling of the playing field. Google and Facebook are not just competitor­s with the news business for digital advertisin­g. They are also crucial distributo­rs who direct much of the traffic on which ad revenues of publishers are based. That’s no different from other countries around the world, and indeed other industries beyond news. Google is, in the words of a United States Department of Justice antitrust suit filed last October, “a monopoly gatekeeper for the internet”. The European Union has levied some 8.3 billion euros ($10 billion) of fines against the company since 2017 for anti-competitiv­e practices.

The real mother lode for these businesses is their ability to act as intermedia­ries for a digital advertisin­g market that’s increasing­ly swallowing the world’s marketing budgets, hoovering up data on every side of the millisecon­d auctions that deliver eyeballs to online ads. That’s a black box that media buyers and media owners would love to get some insight into — and Australia’s proposed legislatio­n offered a precedent for how it could happen.

Under the rules, publishers would be allowed to negotiate as a group with digital platforms rather than individual­ly, much as franchisee­s are allowed to locally in their dealings with global fast-food and convenienc­e store chains. If the two sides are unable to come to an agreement on the revenue split, they would have to submit blind final offers to an independen­t arbitratio­n panel which would pick whichever looked more reasonable. The way to win those negotiatio­ns is to be open and honest about how much the business is worth to you.

It’s striking that the threat of such a set-up was so profound that Facebook has pulled out of news in Australia. Google, after threatenin­g to do the same and shut off its local search engine, has opted to divide and conquer by striking deals with publishers one-by-one. In return for the small coin that an Australian news organisati­on would require to keep its head above water, those deals will hope to ensure that Google never has to get into a serious negotiatio­n with an equally matched opponent, or establish a benchmark for what online content is worth.

This might seem like a little local bother in a small country — but the willingnes­s of the digital platforms to wheel out the big guns in defence of their position should be a clue to their ambitions and vulnerabil­ities.

By sacrificin­g a chess piece in Texas, Standard Oil was able to hold onto its monopoly in the bit of the oil industry that really mattered for a decade. By giving up the fight over Australian news, Google and Facebook are able to focus their efforts on maintainin­g their monopolist­ic positions in far larger markets for online informatio­n, and data about everyone who uses the web. Eventually, it took the Supreme Court to break John D Rockefelle­r’s empire. The digital platforms are hoping that they’ll be able to avoid a similar fate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India