Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

POLITICAL TURMOIL REIGNITES DEBATE OVER CONSERVING AAREY FOREST

- Prayag Arora-desai prayag.desai@hindustant­imes.com

MUMBAI: The movement to protect Aarey Colony as a legal forest, which began in response to the proposed Metro-3 car shed at Prajapurpa­da village, marks one of the most heated debates around conservati­on and urban developmen­t in Mumbai’s recent past.

In October 2019, the Bombay high court (HC) quashed a clutch of petitions by environmen­talists that sought to declare a 33-acre plot in the city’s green lung as a legal forest under the Indian Forest Act (1927). This patch was demarcated in 2013 to construct a car shed for the Metro 3 line.

Thousands of citizens held protests over the cutting of trees. Environmen­talists and Aarey’s indigenous adivasi residents maintained that the plot performs all the ecosystem functions one associates with forests, from providing a home to leopards, to acting as a sponge which absorbs run-off from the nearby Mithi River during heavy rainfall.

Soon after the HC’S ruling, the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporatio­n chopped 98% of the 2,185 trees on that site. In November 2019, after the Uddhav Thackeray-led government came to power, it reversed the previous government’s decision and allotted 102acres of land in Kanjurmarg to build the car shed on. In 2021, it also notified 800 acres of uninhabite­d green cover in Aarey Colony — which is spread over an area of 3180-odd acres— as a reserve forest under the IFA.

“What Uddhav Thackeray did was unimaginab­le. In a city where people are fighting over every square inch of land, he took 800 acres of it and closed it off to developmen­t. It sets a huge precedent for conservati­on. Now it feels like we are back to square one, but... we are prepared to fight again,” said Stalin D, director of NGO Vanashakti, one of the petitioner­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India