Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Consolidat­e bilateral ties with Israel

Trump’s decision to move the US embassy to Jerusalem has isolated Washington internatio­nally

-

tion 181 of November 29, 1947, inter alia creating the Jewish and Arab states in Palestine, had voted to establish a special UN administer­ed internatio­nal regime for the city of Jerusalem. This came to naught as Arab countries did not accept the division of Palestine, and in the resulting conflict West Jerusalem came under Israel’s control, as acknowledg­ed in the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan signed in 1949. Some internatio­nal legitimacy to Israel’s presence in West Jerusalem was accorded by the May 1950 Tripartite Declaratio­n of the US, UK and France that they would take action, both within and outside the UN to prevent violation of the armistice lines of 1949. Further, the UN Security Council resolution­s 242 of November 22, 1967, and 338 of October 22, 1973, called for withdrawal only to the 1949 lines, after the conflicts in those years.

Those advocating for Israel since the late 19th century, have sought to advance their cause by also gaining support for their aspiration­s from the dominant global power of the day, recognisin­g the wide difference­s of opinion between countries on the issue.

British foreign secretary Lord Balfour, in a letter dated November 2, 1917, conveyed that “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishm­ent in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”. This eventually led to the creation of the State of Israel in 1948.

In a letter dated April 14, 2004, to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, US President George Bush stated, inter alia, “in light of new realities on the round including already exist- ing major Israeli population centers, it is unrealisti­c to expect that the outcome of final status negotiatio­ns will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949”. Since then proposals for West Asia peace often talk of land swaps to deal with post-1949 facts on the ground.

Trump’s proclamati­on would no doubt be seen as an endorsemen­t of facts on the ground in support of Israeli aspiration­s. However, he did not go as far as US Congress or Israeli position. The Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 of US Congress had spoken of Jerusalem as an undivided city, and capital of Israel. Trump said that he was not taking a position on final status issues “including the specific boundaries of the Israeli sovereignt­y in Jerusalem, or the resolution of contested borders”, and that these were for the parties to work out.

He also did not say that the US embassy would start functionin­g there immediatel­y. This was possible by renting of some symbolic premise, or converting their present consulate in Jerusalem into an embassy.

While many in Israel would no doubt be gratified by this partial developmen­t, it has also placed the US in an isolated position internatio­nally. In the UNSC debate on December 8, all the other 14 council members, including its European allies, the UK and France, opposed the US decision. However, it will play well with Trump’s base and strengthen evangelica­l Christian and Jewish support for him domestical­ly in the US. This would be important as his presidency struggles with continued innuendos of collaborat­ion with Russia during the presidenti­al election in 2016, and lack of any major foreign policy or domestic achievemen­t.

On December 7, the external affairs ministry spokesman, in response to a query, said that “India’s position on Palestine is independen­t and consistent. It is shaped by our views and interests, and not determined by any third country”. Keeping our embassy in Tel Aviv has not inhibited us from developing a strong bilateral relationsh­ip with Israel. We also establishe­d full diplomatic relations only in 1992, when many countries took similar steps after the dissolutio­n of Soviet Union and in the wake of the Oslo Middle East Peace Process. Even as we should unhesitati­ngly consolidat­e bilateral relations with Israel, it is useful to remain in sync with the broader internatio­nal consensus on Israel-palestine issues.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu with US President Donald Trump, Israel
GETTY IMAGES Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu with US President Donald Trump, Israel

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India