Builders may be first to come under GST watchdog scanner
the anti-profiteering authority has now been set up.”
Experts, however, said the anti-profiteering provision in GST may not be sufficient to ensure that the benefits of reduced tax burden reach consumers as nothing in the law prevents businesses from jacking up prices in a free market, unless the product is under the Essential Commodities Act.
Policymakers too believe that the anti-profiteering provision in GST law is not fool-proof, which might result in litigation. The investigator will require businesses suspected of profiteering to give a justification for any price increase made soon after the GST regime came into force.
“Business reasons for price increase have to be weighed in the scale of rationality and reasonableness. Price increase should not be an attempt by the business to corner the tax benefit,” explained the first person quoted above.
NAA is empowered to order a business it finds to be engaged in profiteering to cut prices or return the undue benefit availed by it along with interest to the customer. In extreme cases, the watchdog can also impose a penalty on the defaulting business or cancel its GST registration.
“Anti-profiteering will certainly apply to real estate because developers are not passing on any benefits to customers. The tax rates under GST have increased but they are getting more input tax credit. So at least some benefits have to be passed on to consumers,” said Abhishek Rastogi, partner at law firm Khaitan and Co. NEW DELHI: The Narendra Modi government is working on a plan to increase the pension it provides to people over the age of 60, widows, and disabled persons, all from so-called Below Poverty Line (BPL) households from the current ~200-1,000 a month to around ~1,600, with some of the increase coming from the states.
The pensions are all part of the National Social Assistance Programme, on which the Central government spent around ~9,300 crore in 2014-15; around 31 million people from poor households benefited from the schemes that year. The Union rural development ministry wants the Centre’s share to be at least ~1,000 a month in each case according to Amarjeet Sinha, the Union rural development secretary. That represents a significant increase from the ~200 a month the Centre currently pays as pension to people between the ages of 60 and 79, widows between the ages of 40 and 59 (they become eligible for old age pension thereafter), and disabled persons under the age of 59 .
In the first case, the Centre doesn’t mandate a contribution from states, although many states do add something to the amount. In the second and third cases, it mandates an equal contribution from the states. “We may go for a matching grant in a 60:40 ratio between the Centre and the states,” added Sinha.
The rural development ministry is in talks with the finance ministry on the proposal.
States currently provide top-up doles to the Centre’s contribution. While some states like Delhi and Andhra Pradesh have substantially increased allocation in a bid to provide a respectable pension, in many states the pension amount remains miserably low. In early 2017, the Arvind Kejriwal government in Delhi increased the pension for people between the ages of 60-69 to ~2,000, and to widows and disabled persons to ~2,500 per month.
There have been several protests in the past demanding an increase in the pensions. When Jairam Ramesh was the Union minister for rural development, he had described the stingy scheme as “an insult to dignity.”