Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Cinema halls can’t prohibit outside food: Bombay HC

- HT Correspond­ent

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court (HC) on Wednesday reiterated that patrons cannot be unilateral­ly prohibited from bringing their own food and water bottles inside theatres and multiplexe­s when vendors are allowed to serve inside at exorbitant prices.

“Either there should be total prohibitio­n – no one should be allowed to carry or serve food inside theatres or multiplexe­s or the viewers should also be allowed to carry their own food and water bottles,” said the division bench of justice Shantanu Kemkar and justice Makrand Karnik. “They cannot compel viewers to buy food articles at exorbitant prices,” the bench said.

The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by city resident Jinendra Baxi, challengin­g the ban on packed food and water bottles inside cinema halls, especially multiplexe­s.

In his PIL, filed through advocate Aditya Pratap, the film writer and director highlighte­d that patrons are not allowed to carry their own food items and water bottles inside theatres when there is no legal restrictio­n on permitting the same inside cinema halls, but fast food is being served in several theatres, especially multiplexe­s and also permitted to be consumed inside theatres, although there is a restrictio­n imposed on it by Rule

.... The viewers should also be allowed to carry their own food and water bottles. They (multiplexe­s) cannot compel viewers to buy food articles at exorbitant prices BOMBAY HIGH COURT

121ofthe Maharashtr­acinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1966.

Baxi contended that the ban violates the fundamenta­l right to life of medically vulnerable persons and senior citizens, as they cannot carry their own food articles and water inside the theatres.

His PIL stated that the Maharashtr­a government being the licencing authority for cinema theatres was legally bound to ensure that fundamenta­l rights of citizens are not undermined by theatre and multiplexe­s. It added that although the petitioner had submitted representa­tions to the government for getting the wrong rectified, the government did not respond to his pleas.

Responding to the PIL, government pleader Purnima Kantharia assured the bench that the government will form its policy in six weeks and submit it to the court on the next date of hearing. The PIL is now posted for further hearing on June 12.

 ?? HT FILE ?? Petitioner argued that the ban on carrying outside food violates the right to life of medically vulnerable persons, senior citizens.
HT FILE Petitioner argued that the ban on carrying outside food violates the right to life of medically vulnerable persons, senior citizens.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India