RTI no guarantee for quick response
NEWDELHI:THE Law Commission of India’s recommendation to the Centre that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) be brought under the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) provides an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of the law when it comes to matters of sport.
Last November, a Hindustan Times correspondent sent an offline RTI request to School Games Federation of India (SGFI), a national sports federation), seeking documents for clarification in a case of alleged age fraud.
MULTIPLE BIRTH DATES
The case involved a player who had submitted multiple birth dates to SGFI in different tournaments. The request didn’t elicit even an acknowledgement from the federation.
With no registration number available for offline RTI requests, this correspondent filed an online request on the same matter on December 6 through the union sports ministry, which transferred the request to SGFI a day later. Once again, the SGFI ignored the query.
A first appeal over the matter was filed on January 14, to which the sports ministry replied on March 15, saying the original request had already been transferred to SGFI, which ignored mails and calls over the matter.
A second appeal application was submitted earlier this month, and SGFI is yet to respond.
CLARIFICATION NEEDED
In another instance, a colleague filed an online RTI request with SGFI on February 1 seeking a clarification on the status of a body affiliated to it. Again, there was no response from SGFI.
When School Games Federation of India , which wields little influence compared to other NSFS, can ignore RTI requests, it remains to be seen if BCCI, the country’s most powerful sports body, will really be bound by the Act if it does come under its purview. In summer, the cricket world spins around the IPL axis. But while India is immersed in the annual cricket carnival much is happening in the cricket world.
Australia, scarred by controversy, is a patient recovering from surgery, taking unsteady steps to healthy life after the ball tampering nightmare. When Steve Smith’s team fiddled with the ball, it sandpapered the nation’s reputation and plunged Australia into its biggest cricket black hole.
The worst, however, is past and the new media deal has dispelled fears about public outrage triggering a commercial backlash.
The deal brought in significant changes: ODI’S and T20 cricket went behind a paywall and Channel 9 lost a property they owned for 40 years.
Australia announced its annual central contracts, equally rewarding Tests and ‘white ball’ experts.
One major beneficiary in this,