Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Kimi’s thirst for glory cost Ferrari

-

a pitstop, was instructed to hold Kimi behind, and this he did loyally while Hamilton saved his own tyres and readied for attack. It was a Mercedes masterclas­s in sandwichin­g a Ferrari, and with Vettel relegated to the back of the pack, they executed this to perfection.

This season, Ferrari has uncharacte­ristically shied away from team orders, even letting Raikkonen finish ahead of Vettel in Austria, when a swap was expected — but it may be time for a frank discussion about the need for a World Championsh­ip outweighin­g the need for equal opportunit­ies.

With the benefit of hindsight, Ferrari should have asked Raikkonen to hold Hamilton right from the start while Vettel roared into the distance. Having Vettel in the lead would immediatel­y pressure Hamilton and, if all went according to plan, Vettel and Raikkonen could even swap places at the very end. Instead, we had Raikkonen go at it — and fail.

I believe Ferrari’s behaviour this season may indicate the Finn’s possible desire to hang up his scarlet shoes. Despite driving better than he has in years, he may not want a contract extension and may instead be hunting a blaze of glory.

Monza brought Raikkonen heartbreak­ingly close to that hurrah, but it was not to be. Everybody loves Raikkonen, but — as we should know from the man who leads America and the man who leads India — the one with the popular vote doesn’t always win.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India