Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

MOGA: TWO INJURED IN ‘PARCEL BOMB’ BLAST SAILING, MILITARY TRAINING HELPED ME SURVIVE ROUGH SEAS: TOMY AADHAAR PUBLIC, LIMITED Govt says historic ruling, Congress too claims victory

CONSTITUTI­ONAL SC upholds validity of Aadhaar for govt welfare schemes; Aadhaar not necessary for banking, mobile services, rules fivejudge bench

- Bhadra Sinha HT Correspond­ent

NEWDELHI: A majority judgment of a Constituti­on Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the constituti­onal validity of Aadhaar, but restricted its use to government welfare schemes funded by the Consolidat­ed Fund of India, in a verdict that the government and the Opposition immediatel­y owned.

The judgment, however, scrapped, wrote down, or amended key clauses in the UIDAI Act to protect the rights of individual­s and prevent misuse of their details, ensuring a partial victory for petitioner­s.

Bank accounts and mobile phone numbers now no longer need to be linked to Aadhaar; and transactio­n details will now only be kept for six months, as against five years as the law originally mandated.

Both the majority and the minority judgments also said decisions of the Speaker could be reviewed judicially, a response to one petition against the government’s definition of the UIDAI bill as a money bill, thereby ensuring that it needed to be passed only by the Lok Sabha, where the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) has a majority.

The majority judgment, however, refused to overturn the government’s decision to define this bill as a money bill.

The five-judge Constituti­on Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra in a 4:1 verdict also added that children cannot be denied school admissions for want for Aadhaar, and asked for ways to deal with exclusions, but said the number would be required for filing income-tax returns, making it necessary to link it with PAN cards.

Justice AK Sikri, who authored the main verdict on behalf of CJI Misra and justice AM Khanwilkar, held: “The whole architectu­re of Aadhaar is devised to give unique identity to the citizens of this country.”

Human dignity, he said, is to be treated as a fundamenta­l right and the scheme envisaged under Aadhaar ensures dignity to the marginalis­ed sections of society.

“This facet of dignity cannot be lost sight of and needs to be acknowledg­ed,” he said.

The court also struck down section 57 of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016, that permitted corporate entities such as telecom companies to avail biometric Aadhaar data. Such a provision had no rationale nexus to the objective of the law, the court said.

Union law and IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said in an interview that the telecom and finance ministries would work with banks and telcos to ensure they erased the data of those who have already completed the linkages.

However, the law minister also left a window open for the government and said its understand­ing was that it could, with legislativ­e backing, insist on such linkages.

THE CONGRESS CALLED THE JUDGMENT AN ENDORSEMEN­T OF THE UPA GOVERNMENT’S VISION FOR AADHAAR

NEWDELHI: The Bharatiya Janata Party (Bjp)-led government and the principal Opposition party, the Congress, both have claimed victory over the Supreme Court’s verdict on Aadhaar on Wednesday.

The Centre hailed the verdict as “historic” and finance minister Arun Jaitley said the Congress had cut a sorry figure in opposing a concept it pioneered when in power. “The court has only disallowed Aadhaar in some cases where it is not backed by law,” the minister said, adding that prohibitio­ns on the usage of Aadhaar laid down by the apex court were not perpetual in nature.

Jaitley said the Congres brought in the unique identity programme without any legislativ­e backing when it was in power and without specifying what it was meant for. “They introduced the idea and then did not know what to do with it.”

The Congress, on the other hand, called the judgment an endorsemen­t of the United Progressiv­e Alliance (UPA) government’s vision for Aadhaar. “For Congress, Aadhaar was an instrument of empowermen­t. For the BJP, Aadhaar is a tool of oppression and surveillan­ce,” Congress chief Rahul Gandhi said. The party, however, warned it will challenge in court any attempt by the government to bring an amendment to the Aadhaar act through the money bill route, which requires assent only by the Lok Sabha.

The government claimed it saved about ₹90,000 crore by eliminatin­g fake and duplicate beneficiar­ies of welfare schemes. “In no field can we be a technology laggard... You have people seriously advocating this in the country,” Jaitley said.

“The version they (the Congress) had drafted was – there shall be an Aadhaar card, this is a procedure (with) which it shall be issued; what it will be used for was unclear from the beginning,” he said.

The minister questioned the Congress’s criticism of technology-based governance, saying some people were advocating against unique identifica­tion and EVMS (electronic voting machines), and in favour of paper ballots and cash.

“You can see the thread running through this thought process but everyone, including critics of Aadhaar, should realise that we cannot afford to defy or ignore technology,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India