It’s high time China was suspended from Interpol

Authoritarian regimes need to face the consequences when they abuse global lawenforcement norms

with the Interpol system is that a lot of nations are not like us and we pretend that they are.” The pioneer in this regard is Russia. In the last 10 years, just as Western lawenforcement agencies began focusing on the financial crimes of Russian oligarchs, the Kremlin began requesting red notices, or requests for arrest and extradition, for its political opponents. Iran has issued red notices for dissidents. Turkey has gotten Interpol to issue a red notice to arrest a writer who had been critical of the government. China has abused the system, issuing a red notice in 2017 for the head of the World Uighur Congress. The Chinese Uighurs are treated as second-class citizens in western China.

In most of these cases, the Interpol system has worked and the red notices were revoked. In the case of Meng Hongwei, who became president of Interpol in 2016, there are two possibilities: Either China nominated a corrupt man to be president of a major international law enforcement agency; or China is detaining an innocent man. Whichever way you interpret it, says Bruno Min, a senior policy adviser at Fair Trials, a Uk-based human-rights group, “It shows disrespect to Interpol.”

Until now, the Western nations of Interpol have been loath to suspend any country’s membership. This practice has to stop. If China doesn’t face consequences for what it has done, then Interpol will be setting the conditions for its own irrelevance. What good is an international law enforcement system that lets rogues act like cops?