Censoring online content is not easy any more

Allowing hostile countries an ingress in the telecom sector must now be a matter of urgent national concern

The debate on whether or not to censor information has been going on for centuries. The term ‘censor’ in Roman times originally referred to the function of special magistrates assigned to supervise public morals and, so long as this remained the remit, the norms governing society provided the guidelines. But as governments, which have for eons used censorship to control the flow of information to its citizens, expanded the definition of censorship to help them combat, for example, the spread of seditious ideas, attempts to fan communalism and the spread of terrorism, the debate has become more complex.

Governments have, over time, used different methodologies and, in some cases, including in democracies, their objective was often to prevent the flow and dissemination of ideas that could be inconvenient to those in authority. None of these efforts, despite short periods of gain, succeeded. The fine line between censorship and restricting content that offended society, however, got progressively blurred with citizens, including creative sections of society, accusing governments of violating their fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. The other powerful argument against censorship is that it inhibits access to knowledge and stunts innovation.

At the same time, governments today are confronted with complex situations where threats to life and society have got magnified. This is more the case when a country is flanked by hostile neighbours. In India, for example, terrorism and threats posed by hostile elements intent on creating communal violence challenge the resources of the government. These have the advantage of surprise and, often, anonymity. The government’s objective of preventing violence or spread of terror necessitates the monitoring and tracking of communications to detect terrorists and their plans and prevent situa- tions from spiralling out of control.

Authoritarian and repressive states have traditionally focused on establishing strong and effective internal security services to control their populace and retain their monopoly on power. They use censorship to controlwhatinformationcanbeaccessedby their populace and augment that with propaganda. The rapid advances, especially in the last two decades, in telecommunications technology has intertwined interception, hacking of the Internet and censorship. Undoubtedly, in this process, privacy is eroded. Even authoritarian governments like the People’s Republic of China, who have invested huge amounts in the instruments of control, including Big Data, and have achieved a measure of success in censoring the Internet, have not been entirely successful.

With the evolution of technology, censorship is increasingly moving from the realm of print to cyberspace. Censoring the Internet or hacking communications — or for that matter even the mobile telephone — will become increasingly difficult with the refinement of encryption services. This technology has made it difficult for government agencies to monitor or censor content without the collaboration of private telecommunication companies.

The advent of Quantum technology has placed the telecommunications industry on the cusp of tectonic change. At least two new studies state that recent experiments with Chinese and European satellites have the brought the prospects of a space-based almost unhackable Quantum Internet closer to reality. It is possible to envisage that within years the public Internet will be space-based. In other words, communications will flow directly from mobile handsets to transponders in satellites. Data will be stored on the cloud where the two biggest service providers are American and Chinese — Google and China’s Alibaba. With the close linkage between Alibaba and China’s security apparatus, the latter will retain access to data stored on the cloud. So will the US, but other countries who lack the software and hardware capabilities will be severely handicapped.

In addition to the danger of unauthorised access to information, this technology opens the possibility of other countries intercepting and censoring content that will increasingly be carried over Internet. The danger of allowing ingress to nationally critical sectors, like telecommunications, to countries that are not friendly must now be a matter of immediate national concern.

We not only suffer physical illness from stress, but we create emotional and mental difficulties when we are not calm. Through meditation we can keep a calm and peaceful mind to help us lead happier lives. When we meditate, we control our heart rate and breathing to a point where we are calm. It can hence improve our health and well-being physically, mentally, and spiritually.