MP Lokayukta seeks fresh nod for pending cases’ trial

BHOPAL: Madhya Pradesh’s Lokayukta has sought fresh sanctions from the state’s new Congress government to prosecute 281 people in 245 cases. The anticorruption ombudsman had earlier failed to get the approvals from the state’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, which was voted out of power after 15 years in November, to put them on trial, officials in the Lokayukta office said.

“With the new government taking over, we are once again writing to all the departments to provide the necessary sanctions,” said Lokayukta director general Anil Kumar.

The officials said they were now hopeful of prosecution sanctions in many cases. “...in some of the cases, the accused were close to the [previous BJP] government and hence no decision was taken on giving the prosecution sanctions,” said a Lokayukta official on condition of anonymity.

BJP spokesman Rajneesh Agrawal insisted his party’s government never tolerated corruption. “...there were never political considerations in withholding prosecution sanctions,’’ he said.

Officials said an assistant commissioner is among the people against whom prosecution sanction has been sought afresh. He had been booked for alleged disproportionate assets in 2013. They said the go-ahead for putting him on trial was not given even as the first letter in this regard was sent in December 2015. Several reminders have since been sent for his prosecution sanction.

In another case, sanction was initially given to prosecute a labour officer, who was booked in a disproportionate assets case in 2012. The sanction was later withdrawn on his request.

A Lokayukta official, who is familiar with this case, said they have moved the high court in this regard. Kumar said they have this year moved the high court against denial of prosecution sanction in five cases. So far, they have appealed against permission denial in 10 cases.

The officials said that prosecution sanction is awaited against 92 class I and class II officers, including an Indian Administrative Service officer, and 199 class III and IV officials. To put on trial class I and II officers, permission is needed from the state cabinet, which is routed through the general administration department.