Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Is it time for diplomacy?

Yes, but only if Pakistan cracks down on terror

-

After Pulwama, India was outraged. And New Delhi rightly changed the rules of engagement with Pakistan and showed that Islamabad’s strategy of using non-state terror groups to wage an assymetric war comes at a price. The decision to use air strikes to target a Jaish-e-mohammed terror camp was the correct one. The Pakistani deep State needed to understand that this is a new India; an impatient India, which will not continue to absorb attacks sponsored by them. It will not get bullied by nuclear blackmail; it will push the envelope with retaliator­y responses or ‘pre-emptive strikes’; and it has the support of a large section of the internatio­nal community in this battle against terror. The Narendra Modi government laid out new red lines, executed a successful and proportion­al mission, and played its diplomatic cards well.

Pakistan was rattled on Tuesday. As a sovereign state, whose very identity and ideologica­l rationale is based on its opposition of India, the strikes deep in its territory dealt a humiliatin­g blow. In a polity with an all-powerful army, it raised serious questions about Pakistan’s defence abilities. The strikes generated domestic pressure on the regime to respond. This, we believe, was the wrong lesson for Islamabad to draw.

What it should have learnt is that the time to back terror groups is now over. And if it does not act against them, India will. But once it had decided to retaliate to cater to its own domestic constituen­cy, Pakistan went ahead with an air offensive across the Line of Control on Wednesday morning. In the process, both sides shot down each other’s fighters. The Pakistanis also captured one Indian Air Force pilot. It is now time to step back.

The reality is that India demonstrat­ed its capability in a measured way and mobilised all major internatio­nal powers against the use of terror. It redefined the nuclear threshold. And while it will be a long haul, it has initiated a process to change the costbenefi­t calculus in Pakistan about the sponsorshi­p of terror. At the same time, Islamabad, with its symbolic response, can show its domestic constituen­cy that it takes attacks on sovereignt­y seriously. Both sides need to think about the escalatory ladder. A war will extract tremendous costs and it is time for diplomacy to take over.

The roadmap is clear. A back-channel and quiet process of negotiatio­n between both sides must kick off. Pakistan must, immediatel­y, hand over Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, to India. It must then categorica­lly commit to not allowing Pakistani soil for anti-indian activities. The internatio­nal community must firmly pressure Pakistan in this direction and seek an enforceabl­e mechanism to judge its future actions. India can then reiterate that it has no intention of prolonging the conflict; its actions were measured and will continue to be measured, as long as Islamabad fulfils its promise of cracking down on terror. There is a narrow window at the moment to de-escalate. It is time to grab it. If Pakistan doesn’t see it that way, the new India has indicated its willingnes­s to go the distance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India