Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

‘New Pak’ must show new action’

-

This has prompted criticism by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party that they were toeing Islamabad’s line.

The bombing, following the September 2016 surgical strikes that followed the death of 19 soldiers in Jammu and Kashmir’s Uri, has demonstrat­ed that India would no longer hesitate to strike back against cross-border terrorism, analysts have said. The air strike was prompted by the February 14 suicide car bombing in Pulwama that left 40 Indian paramilita­ry troopers dead.

The external affairs ministry spokesman said on Saturday that Islamabad must take “verifiable” steps to dismantle terrorist infrastruc­ture on the ground.

“If Pakistan claims to be a Naya (new) Pakistan with nayi soch (new thinking), it should show naya action against terrorist groups and terror infrastruc­ture on its soil and end cross-border terrorism in support of its claims,” Kumar told a regular news briefing.

India, he added, is “resolute in our determinat­ion to persuade the internatio­nal community of the necessity of compelling Pakistan to move beyond mere words and to show credible, verifiable and sustained actions” against terror. India’s armed forces are maintainin­g strict vigil and are determined to defend the country, though India will continue to act with “responsibi­lity and maturity”, he said.

Asked about Khan’s remarks on Sunday accusing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi of engaging in politics of hatred and about the targeting of minorities following the February 14 terror attack in Pulwama, Kumar replied: “The Pakistani prime minister has a penchant of issuing statements on internal affairs of India, and this is part of the Pakistani narrative to deflect attention and take the focus elsewhere, especially when they come under pressure on counterter­rorism.”

The world community has stood with India in condemning the Pulwama attack, which was claimed by JEM, and in asking Pakistan to act against terrorist infrastruc­ture in territorie­s under its control. However, Pakistan continues to deny Jem’s claim of the attack and foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi had said the banned group had not claimed responsibi­lity. “Is Pakistan defending the JEM and acting as its spokespers­on?” Kumar said.

Pakistan has claimed to have taken fresh action against terror groups, such as banning some organisati­ons and placing some individual­s in “preventive detention”, but Kumar said: “We are seeing the same script that has been played out earlier after the terrorist attacks on our Parliament in December 2001, the Mumbai terrorist attack in November 2008 and the attack on Pathankot airbase in January 2016. Pakistan claims to proscribe groups and individual­s, but this is confined only on paper.”

Kumar said talks to be held between the two sides on March 14 on the Kartarpur corridor are “not in any way a resumption of bilateral dialogue”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India