Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Vikram made ‘hard landing’: Govt in LS

- Anonna Dutta

NEW DELHI: The Vikram lander of India’s moon mission Chandrayaa­n-2 made a “hard landing” on the lunar surface on September 7, the Union government said in Parliament on Wednesday, confirming speculatio­n about its fate and findings by Nasa.

The lander on board the Indian Space Research Organisati­on (Isro) spacecraft “hard landed within 500m of the designated landing site”, minister of state for space Jitendra Singh said in a written reply in Lok Sabha.

The reply said the total cost of the project was ~970 crore; the satellites cost ~603 crore and the launch vehicle ~367 crore.

Singh added that the velocity of the lander reduced more than anticipate­d during a crucial period — described by Isro chief K Sivan as “15 minutes of terror” — leading to the carefully planned final stages going awry just 2.1km from the surface of the moon.

“The velocity was reduced from 1,683m/s to 146 m/s. During the second phase of the descent, the reduction in velocity was more than the designed value. Due to this deviation, the initial conditions at the start of the fine braking phase were beyond the designed parameters. As a result, Vikram hard landed within 500m of the designated landing site,” the written reply said. The minister’s response was to a question regarding the reason for failure of Vikram to land smoothly asked by BJP MP KV Singh.

A successful mission would have made India the fourth country to have landed on the lunar surface after the US, the erstwhile USSR, and China. It would have also made India the first country to have landed close to the South Pole of the moon.

After the scientific payloads aboard Chandrayaa­n-1 confirmed the presence of water-ice on the surface of the moon, the Vikram lander and Pragyan rover were meant to physically observe the ice and hydroxyl molecules. This was India’s first attempt to land on a celestial body with an indigenous­ly developed robotics system. The minister’s reply explained that, during the first and the longest phase, the lander was brought down from an altitude of 30km to 7.4km in about 10 minutes without any hitch. However, during the second phase, the velocity was reduced more than anticipate­d, resulting in a deviation beyond the designed parameters for the start of the third phase. This was likely due to the propulsion system not working as planned, an official from Isro said.

Soon after the landing went awry, Isro had said in a statement: “Vikram lander descent was as planned and normal performanc­e was observed up to an altitude of 2.1 km... Communicat­ion to the ground stations was lost. Data is being analysed.”

A national committee of academicia­ns and Isro experts was set up to analyse the data and find out the cause of communicat­ion loss. “The report is unlikely to be made public, but the findings will come out in Parliament...,” said Isro spokespers­on Vivek Singh.

Though media reports did suggest over the last two months that Vikram made a hard landing on the moon’s surface, it was not officially confirmed by Isro or the government until now. In midseptemb­er, after its orbiter tried to locate the lander during a flyover, Nasa also said that Vikram may have made a hard landing.

“Vikram had a hard landing and the precise location of the spacecraft in the lunar highlands has yet to be determined,” Nasa said while releasing a photo of a 150km swathe around the landing site captured by its Lunar Reconnaiss­ance Orbiter on September 17. It again could not locate the lander during a subsequent flyover on October 14.

“Earlier, Chandrayaa­n 3 was supposed to be a partnershi­p with Japan...but now there are talks of a lander-rover mission in between. The analysis will also help Isro in understand­ing what went wrong and what are the other possible problems and make the next mission foolproof...,” said Ajay Lele, senior fellow at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India