Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

After SAD opts out of Delhi, ties with BJP in Punjab come under strain

ALL IS NOT WELL Latest flashpoint stems from the SAD’S unequivoca­l stand for the inclusion of Muslims in the CAA

- HT Correspond­ent

CHANDIGARH:THE Shiromani Akali Dal’s decision not to contest the Delhi assembly elections over difference­s with the BJP on the Citizenshi­p (Amendment) Act has added a fresh strain to perceptive­ly uneasy ties between the long-standing political allies.

The developmen­t has not only laid bare the CAA fault lines within the National Democratic Alliance at the Centre, but it is also likely to impact the SAD-BJP alliance in Punjab where the Akalis are a dominant partner.

The latest flashpoint stemmed from the SAD’S unequivoca­l stand for the inclusion of Muslims in the CAA which evidently raised the BJP’S hackles. This was amply articulate­d by SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal in an interview to Hindustan Times last week.0

“I am not for a re-think on CAA but Muslims should be included. This will earn a lot of goodwill,” he had said – a line that apparently didn’t go down well with the BJP.

The issue flared up in the run up to the assembly polls in the national capital in which the Akalis were staking claim on four Sikh-dominated constituen­cy as part of its alliance with the BJP.

But a miffed saffron party asked the Akalis to first take a clear pro-caa stand before finalising the seat-sharing deal. The Akalis baulked at the BJP’S demand and instead opted out of the contest in protest.

IN HARYANA, BJP HAD REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE AKALIS’ DEMAND FOR A BIGGER SHARE OF SEATS

ADVANTAGE AAP?

The BJP has apparently made up its mind to go it alone as it has fielded its own candidates on the seats that the Akalis had planned to contest. Short of snapping their alliance, both parties have called off their electoral alliance in the national capital – a developmen­t that, according to political observers, may play to the advantage of the incumbent Aam Aadmi Party in half a dozen constituen­cies with substantia­l Sikh voters.

It is not clear yet how their face-off over the contentiou­s CAA will play out within the NDA, but it is sure to impact their ties in Punjab where they contested all elections together since 1996. Despite their ‘all-is-well’ posturing, the rough edges in the SADBJP

ties have been showing up since the BJP’S second coming at the Centre with a comfortabl­e majority in the Lok Sabha election last year.

That was evident in the Haryana assembly polls in October when the BJP refused to accept the Akalis’ demand for a bigger share of seats. Instead, it poached on the Akali candidates, much to the chagrin of SAD that had to go it alone and drew a blank.

REBELLION WITHIN

The Delhi break-up comes at a time when the SAD is convulsed by rebellion by a section of its veteran leaders led by Rajya Sabha MP Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa who has made a common cause with the anti-badal Sikh factions.

“The internal turmoil in the SAD has emboldened the BJP to read the riot act to its partner on the CAA issue,” a senior Akali leader said, requesting anonymity.

The BJP’S tough stance fits the pattern in which its Punjab leaders have been publicly arguing in favour of re-negotiatin­g its seatsharin­g agreement in the state where the Akalis have long been dominant partners with the saffron party playing second fiddle.

But senior Akali leaders are playing down the impact of the Delhi rupture.

“Punjab and Delhi are entirely different, and the BJP’S leadership knows that,” SAD spokespers­on Daljeet Singh Cheema said.

“But we fail to understand why the BJP is so touchy about our demand for including Muslims in the CAA. We voted for the Bill in Parliament. They can’t forget that we have stood with them in thick and thin,” he added.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India