Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Masks, sanitisers out of essentials’ list

- HT Correspond­ents

SHORTAGE OVERCOME, NO FURTHER NEED TO INCLUDE THE PRODUCTS UNDER ESSENTIAL COMMODITIE­S ACT, SAID GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

NEW DELHI: The Centre has removed masks and sanitisers from the purview of the Essential Commoditie­s Act, citing the absence of reports of shortages of such items from anywhere in the country. The items were brought under the purview of this law in March when demand for them outstrippe­d supply, with an eye on capping prices. Masks and sanitisers remain the first line of defence to prevent the spread of the coronaviru­s disease.

“There are no adverse reports with respect to price or availabili­ty to continue (to treat) face masks and hand sanitisers as essential commoditie­s,” a Union consumer affairs ministry order said last week.

Since late March companies have significan­tly increased production of sanitisers and several have also entered these businesses. The emergence of twoand three-play cloth masks as adequate protection (as opposed to the N95 masks that people thought were the only protection in March) has also played a role in ensuing adequate supply.

Officials allayed fears that the move may lead to a spike in prices citing their adequate supply. “Usually retail prices go up when there is more demand than supply. A few months ago, there was a shortage of these items, which is why they were brought under the Act... Now there is indigenous manufactur­ing also of these items. We are comfortabl­y placed, and experts reviewing the matter did not find the need to continue the restrictio­ns,” said an official in the pharmaceut­icals department , who asked not to be named.

Officials said the supply of personal protection equipment, including masks, and hand sanitisers, has now been streamline­d at hospitals too.

“There was a shortage a few months ago but now these are readily available, and even the prices have come down,” said a person associated with Max Healthcare, which runs a chain of hospitals.

The production and supply of masks and hand sanitisers were regulated as per the law and various states put price caps on them. Hoarding of any item declared as an essential commodity is an offence under the Act and can lead to imprisonme­nt of up to seven years.

A second official in the pharmaceut­icals department said a frequent review of these items in all states and Union Territorie­s showed that supply is enough to meet demand. “Therefore, no shortage is anticipate­d. The government will continue to monitor the prices of these commoditie­s under regular channels.”

The Directorat­e General of Foreign Trade on March 20 banned exports of masks, textile raw material used for making them, and ventilator­s in view of the pandemic. The order denotifyin­g masks and sanitisers as essential items will have no bearing on the export ban, the second official said. That means they can’t be exported.

On June 29, the restricted export of PPE kits was allowed by the Directorat­e General of Foreign Trade. A monthly quota of five million PPE for Covid-19 units has been fixed, for issuance of export licences.

Abhishek Aggrawal, an analyst with commoditie­s trading firm Comtrade, said that if supply is equal to or more than demand, then there is no legal justificat­ion for treating any item as essential. “The original notificati­on declaring these items as essential was till June-end.”

“Even after four months of the pandemic, we are still not getting adequate number of sanitisers in our hospitals and clinics. With this new rule, the essential materials will once again be sold at a higher price, which will add to to the ongoing the crisis and patient bills. Unless these items are easily available in chemist stores at reasonable rates, its removal from the list of essential items is not the right step,” said Dr Deepak Baid, president, Associatio­n of Medical Consultant­s, Mumbai.

LUCKNOW: Shortly after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the 21-day nationwide lockdown to fight the Covid-19 pandemic in March, Sanjay Singh, a 45-year-old resident of Mirzapur village in Jalaun district realised that there was a crisis in the making.

Jalaun lies in the plains of Bundelkhan­d, a region from where several thousand men and women migrate to Mumbai in Maharashtr­a, Surat and Ahmedabad in Gujarat, Bengaluru in Karnataka and other metropolis­es, in search of work. When the lockdown began on March 25, Singh saw residents of nearby villages make frantic calls to their family members living as migrants in big cities, fearful of their survival. Within a few days, one of the country’s biggest reverse migration movements began, as migrant workers took to the roads, often on foot, to go back to their home states.

Towards the end of March, such a group of migrant workers had reached Madhya Pradesh’s Datia district, but to enter their home state, permission­s from top officials like the chief secretary and additional chief secretary (Home) in Lucknow were required. In the meantime, the police had a tough task controllin­g the workers who were impatient to cross into Uttar Pradesh. It was also an arduous task for the administra­tion of districts to supply food and water.

That’s when Singh, who runs a voluntary organisati­on called Parmarth Samaj Sewi Sansthan which works on livelihood and

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India