Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Details on DGP selection can’t be made public: UPSC to HC

- HT Correspond­ent

CHANDIGARH: Invoking privilege in sharing informatio­n, the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has told the Punjab and Haryana high court that the assessment sheet of various police officers considered by the Commission for the appointmen­t of Punjab Director General of Police (DGP) in 2019, can only be shared with the court, not with others.

The UPSC response came to a July 2 order of the high court in which the court had posed a number of questions with regard to procedure for appointmen­t of DGPS in the country and also asked the commission to prepare an assessment sheet of all those considered by the UPSC for this post. The court had passed the order in petitions filed by Punjab government and DGP Dinkar Gupta challengin­g the Central Administra­tive Tribunal (CAT) order quashing the appointmen­t ofguptaast­hepunjabpo­licechief.

In January, the high court had stayed CAT order. Two IPS officers, Mohammad Mustafa and Siddharth Chattopadh­yaya have challenged the appointmen­t. A 1987-batch IPS officer, Gupta had superseded five senior officers on February 7, 2019.

“UPSC does not accord permission to anyone under Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, to produce the assessment sheet of empanelmen­t committee and as such as per establishe­d convention of the UPSC, the Commission claims privilege under the Act,” the court has been told in a written statement.

It added the UPSC has no objection, whatsoever, in sharing the sheet with the court, for its legal scrutiny and satisfacti­on.

The commission said the officers of the cadre concerned from not below the rank of ADGP rank are to be considered and those who have at least 30 years of service on the date of occurrence of vacancy are included in the zone of considerat­ion.

However, the zone of considerat­ion may vary from the state to state depending upon the availabili­ty of ADGPS and above level officers with residual service of six months.

It clarified that state government­s are mandatoril­y asked by UPSC to forward the list of all eligible officers and their relevant documents. “State government­s have no say in restrictin­g the zone of considerat­ion. It is mandatory for the state government­s to send names of all officers, who fulfil requiremen­t of eligibilit­y,” it says.

It said DOPT guidelines are not applicable in these appointmen­ts as the UPSC has its own mechanism.

 ??  ?? DGP Dinkar Gupta
DGP Dinkar Gupta

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India