Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Should reconsider J&K’S 4G restoratio­n: SC to Centre

NGO filed plea against Centre, J&K admn for failure in complying with SC’S May 11 directions for review of restrictio­ns on internet speed

- Murali Krishnan

NEW DELHI: The Centre should explore the possibilit­y of restoring high-speed 4G mobile internet services in Jammu & Kashmir in view of the statements of GC Murmu, the former lieutenant governor of the Union territory, backing the restoratio­n, the Supreme Court said on Friday.

“L-G [Murmu] has said that there is no difficulty in restoring 4G. You have to give [an] explanatio­n to that,” justice R Subhash Reddy told solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the J&K administra­tion.

Justice Reddy is a part of a three-judge bench hearing a petition of NGO Foundation for Media Profession­als seeking contempt proceeding­s against the Centre and J&K administra­tion for their failure in complying with the Supreme Court’s May 11 directions for a review of restrictio­ns on the mobile internetsp­eed. Murmu,whowassucc­eeded by Manoj Sinha as the lieutenant governor on Friday, said on July 24 the restoratio­n of 4G services will not be a problem and Pakistan will continue with its propaganda even if the mobile internet speed is restricted to 2G. The Centre has cited Islamabad’s propaganda while justifying the restrictio­ns.

The petitioner­s highlighte­d Murmu’s statement to argue for restoratio­n of 4G services when the matter was heard on July 28. Mehta sought time to file a response to the petitioner’s rejoinder.

The court allowed it and adjourned the case until August 11 even as it said no further adjournmen­ts will be allowed. “L-G is not part of the review committee. In your response, do not go strictly by whether or not contempt is there. You should also say whether 4G can be restored in areas [where there are no troubles],” justice Reddy said.

The Centre on July 28 told the Supreme Court it will verify media reports that said Murmu has advocated the restoratio­n of high-speed 4G internet services.

This came days after the Centre filed an affidavit before the court on July 21, saying a special panel constitute­d as per the latter’s May 11 order has decided against any relaxation­s for now.

The Centre said the restrictio­ns would continue for two more months before they are reviewed again. It added the panel constitute­d for the review on June 10 considered all aspects of the matter, including terror strikes, before deciding to continue the restrictio­ns on 4G services.

The May 11 order was passed after the NGO in April challenged restrictio­ns on mobile internet speed to 2G. The NGO sought restoratio­n of 4G services saying people were unable to access the latest informatio­n, guidelines, advisories and restrictio­ns about Covid-19 pandemic because of the restrictio­ns. It pointed out that slow internet speeds make telemedici­ne, or online consultati­on, impossible.

The Supreme Court on May 11 refrained from passing directions to restore 4G services and instead ordered a constituti­on of the panel comprising high-level government officers, including the Union home secretary, to take a call on the matter.

The NGO in June filed the contempt petition saying there was no informatio­n available whether the constituti­on of the panel was notified and whether it has conducted any meetings or passed any orders.

The Centre told the court the panel was constitute­d by virtue of the May 11 order and no separate notificati­on was required. The panel met on May 15 and sought further inputs before taking any decision. It again met on June 10 and decided not to relax the restrictio­ns, the Centre said.

A communicat­ions blackout and a lockdown were imposed in J&K in August last year as part of measures to prevent protests against the Centre’s move to divest the region of its special status. Most of the restrictio­ns have since been eased even as mobile internet remains restricted.

 ?? AFP ?? A soldier stands guard at a street in Srinagar on August 5.
AFP A soldier stands guard at a street in Srinagar on August 5.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India